Prey preferences of Eurasian ruffe and yellow perch: Comparison of laboratory results with composition of Great Lakes benthos

被引:30
作者
Fullerton, AH
Lamberti, GA [1 ]
Lodge, DM
Berg, MB
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Dept Biol, Chicago, IL 60626 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
ruffe; yellow perch; benthic macroinvertebrates; food preference;
D O I
10.1016/S0380-1330(98)70823-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The consumption of benthic macroinvertebrates by ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens), two potential competitors in the Great Lakes, was investigated. Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the food preferences of ruffe and yellow perch and to compare their feeding rates on two types of substrate (sand and cobble). For comparison with natural communities, we sampled benthic macroinvertebrates from western Lake Michigan and compiled published data on invertebrate community structure from all of the Great Lakes. Ruffe and yellow perch both preferentially consumed soft-bodied taxa (e.g., chironomid midge larvae, mayflies, and non-cased caddisflies) and avoided hard-bodied taxa (e.g., cased caddisflies, snails, and clams) in laboratory studies. Prey preferences of fish in mixed-fish species treatments were more diverse than those in single-fish species treatments. Ruffe and yellow perch of similar sizes consumed approximately 5% of their body mass per 24 hours at 20 degrees C on sand, whereas their feeding rates were reduced by over 50% on cobble, where prey were likely able to escape predation by hiding. Results from our laboratory experiments, field survey, and review of published studies indicate that oligochaetes and chironomids, the two most numerous macroinvertebrate taxa in each of the Great Lakes, are vulnerable to ruffe predation. Less abundant taxa range from vulnerable (amphipods, flatworms, and caddisflies) to invulnerable (sphaeriid clams, gastropods, and zebra mussels). Our study suggests that (I) the composition of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna in each of the Great Lakes is suitable for ruffe, and (2) ruffe and yellow perch will likely prefer similar food resources where they co-occur.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 328
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Biostatistical analysis
[2]   BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES OF THE NEARSHORE ZONE OF EASTERN LAKE HURON, GEORGIAN BAY, AND NORTH CHANNEL [J].
BARTON, DR ;
GRIFFITHS, M .
JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 1984, 10 (04) :407-416
[4]   COMPETITION BETWEEN A PLANKTIVORE, A BENTHIVORE, AND A SPECIES WITH ONTOGENIC DIET SHIFTS [J].
BERGMAN, E ;
GREENBERG, LA .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (05) :1233-1245
[5]  
Boron S., 1987, Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, V17, P59
[6]   Fish community changes in the St. Louis River estuary, Lake Superior, 1989-1996: Is it ruffe or population dynamics? [J].
Bronte, CR ;
Evrard, LM ;
Brown, WP ;
Mayo, KR ;
Edwards, AJ .
JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 1998, 24 (02) :309-318
[7]  
CRAIG JF, 1987, BIOL YELLOW PERCH RE
[8]   PATTERNS OF EXCITATION OF THE LATERAL LINE OF THE RUFFE [J].
GRAY, JAB ;
BEST, ACG .
JOURNAL OF THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1989, 69 (02) :289-306
[9]  
Griffiths Ronald W., 1993, P415
[10]  
HAYWARD RS, 1987, T AM FISH SOC, V116, P210, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1987)116<210:EEOPSA>2.0.CO