Some cross-cultural evidence on ethical reasoning

被引:104
作者
Tsui, J
Windsor, C
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Accountancy, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Griffith Univ, Fac Commerce & Management, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
auditors; ethical reasoning; Hofstede's culture theory; Kohlberg's cognitive moral development theory;
D O I
10.1023/A:1010727320265
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study draws on Kohlberg's Cognitive Moral Development Theory and Hofstede's Culture Theory to examine whether cultural differences are associated with variations in ethical reasoning. Ethical reasoning levels for auditors from Australia and China are expected to be different since auditors from China and Australia are also different in terms of the cultural dimensions of long term orientation, power distance, uncertainty avoidance and individualism. The Defining Issues Tests measuring ethical reasoning P scores were distributed to auditors from Australia and China including Hong Kong and The Chinese Mainland. Results show that auditors from Australia have higher ethical reasoning scores than those from China, consistent with Hofstede's Culture Theory predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 150
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MEASUREMENT MORAL JU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CULTURES ORG SOFTWAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], WINNING WAYS CORPORA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1961, PHILOS AUDITING
[5]  
ARNOLD DF, 1991, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V10, P1
[6]  
Blalock Hubert., 1979, Social Statistics
[7]  
Etherington L., 1995, RES ACCOUNTING ETHIC, P235
[8]   A CONTINGENCY FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING IN MARKETING [J].
FERRELL, OC ;
GRESHAM, LG .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1985, 49 (03) :87-96
[9]  
Gul F. A., 1993, INT J ACCOUNTING, V28, P356