Comparative preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics of a cremophor-free, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) and paclitaxel formulated in cremophor (Taxol)

被引:398
作者
Sparreboom, A
Scripture, CD
Trieu, V
Williams, PJ
De, TP
Yang, A
Beals, B
Figg, WD
Hawkins, M
Desai, N
机构
[1] Amer BioSci Inc, Santa Monica, CA USA
[2] Univ Pacific, Stockton, CA 95211 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2291
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic properties of paclitaxel formulated as a Cremophor-free, albumin-bound nanoparticle (ABI-007) and formulated in Cremophorethanol (Taxol). Experimental Design: ABI-007 and Taxol were given i.v. to Harlan Sprague-Dawley male rats to determine pharmacokinetic and drug disposition. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetic properties also were assessed in 27 patients with advanced solid tumors who were randomly assigned to treatment with ABI-007 (260 mg/m(2), 30 minutes; n = 14) or Taxol (175 mg/m(2), 3 hours; n = 13), with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Results: The volume of distribution at steady state and clearance for paclitaxel formulated as Cremophor-free nanoparticle ABI-007 were significantly greater than those for paclitaxel formulated with Cremophor (Taxol) in rats. Fecal excretion was the main elimination pathway with both formulations. Consistent with the preclinical data, paclitaxel clearance and volume of distribution were significantly higher for ABI-007 than for Taxol in humans [21.13 versus 14.76 L/h/m(2) (p 0.048) and 663.8 versus 433.4 L/m(2) (P = 0.040), respectively]. Conclusions: Paclitaxel formulated as ABI-007 differs from paclitaxel formulated as Taxol, with a higher plasma clearance and a larger volume of distribution. This finding is consistent with the absence of paclitaxel -sequestering Cremophor micelles after administration of ABI-007. This unique property of ABI-007 could be important for its therapeutic effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:4136 / 4143
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Adams J D, 1993, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P141
[2]  
BAKER RJ, 1957, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V104, P183
[3]  
*BRIST MYER SQUIBB, 2003, TAX PACL INJ
[4]  
EISEMAN JL, 1994, CANCER CHEMOTH PHARM, V34, P465, DOI 10.1007/BF00685656
[5]   Inhibition of paclitaxel elimination in the isolated perfused rat liver by Cremophor EL [J].
Ellis, AG ;
Webster, LK .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 43 (01) :13-18
[6]  
Gelderblom H, 2002, CLIN CANCER RES, V8, P1237
[7]   Cremophor EL: the drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation [J].
Gelderblom, H ;
Verweij, J ;
Nooter, K ;
Sparreboom, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (13) :1590-1598
[8]   NONLINEAR PHARMACOKINETICS AND METABOLISM OF PACLITAXEL AND ITS PHARMACOKINETIC/PHARMACODYNAMIC RELATIONSHIPS IN HUMANS [J].
GIANNI, L ;
KEARNS, CM ;
GIANI, A ;
CAPRI, G ;
VIGANO, L ;
LOCATELLI, A ;
BONADONNA, G ;
EGORIN, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (01) :180-190
[9]   Phase I study of weekly outpatient paclitaxel and concurrent cranial irradiation in adults with astrocytomas [J].
Glantz, MJ ;
Choy, H ;
Kearns, CM ;
Cole, BF ;
Mills, P ;
Zuhowski, EG ;
Saris, S ;
Rhodes, CH ;
Stopa, E ;
Egorin, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (02) :600-609
[10]   Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic model for paclitaxel [J].
Henningsson, A ;
Karlsson, MO ;
Viganò, L ;
Gianni, L ;
Verweij, J ;
Sparreboom, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (20) :4065-4073