Lower Risk of Advanced Neoplasia Among Patients With a Previous Negative Result From a Fecal Test for Colorectal Cancer

被引:64
作者
Denters, Maaike J. [1 ]
Deutekom, Marije [2 ]
Bossuyt, Patrick M. [3 ]
Stroobants, An K. [4 ]
Fockens, Paul [1 ]
Dekker, Evelien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Social Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Chem, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Diagnostic Yield; Average-Risk Population; Colon Cancer Screening; Efficacy; OCCULT-BLOOD-TEST; AVERAGE-RISK; POPULATION; COLONOSCOPY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.024
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Consecutive rounds of fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are used to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC); they detect precursor lesions and early-stage disease. We assessed whether the positivity rate and the positive predictive values (PPVs) for advanced neoplasia and CRC decrease with repeated testing by using fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). METHODS: Data were collected from 2 rounds of screening. In the first round, average-risk persons (50 to 74 years old) were randomly assigned to groups that received the guaiac FOBT or FIT. In the second round, the subjects received only FIT (1594 received FIT after guaiac FOBT and 2022 received FIT after FIT). The positivity rate and PPV for advanced neoplasia and CRC were compared between second-round participants with a previous negative test result (FIT after guaiac FOBT or FIT after FIT) and first-round participants (guaiac FOBT or FIT). RESULTS: The rate of positive results from FIT was 7.4% in the FIT-after-FIT group, compared with 8.1% in the first-round FIT group (P = .34). A significant decrease was observed in the PPV for advanced neoplasia between the first and second round from 55% (132/239) to 44% (112/252; P = .017). The PPV for CRC was 8% (20/239) in the first round versus 4% (9/252) in the second round (P = .024). Ten interval cancers were diagnosed. There were no significant differences in stages of cancers detected in the first and second round or the interval cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of positive results from FIT does not decrease after repeated CRC screening, but the PPVs of FIT for advanced neoplasia and for CRC are significantly lower among second-round participants who tested negative in the first round.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics [J].
Allison, James E. ;
Sakoda, Lori C. ;
Levin, Theodore R. ;
Tucker, Jo P. ;
Tekawa, Irene S. ;
Cuff, Thomas ;
Pauly, Mary Pat ;
Shlager, Lyle ;
Palitz, Albert M. ;
Zhao, Wei K. ;
Schwartz, J. Sanford ;
Ransohoff, David F. ;
Selby, Joseph V. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (19) :1462-1470
[2]  
Allison JE, 2001, NEW ENGL J MED, V345, P1850
[3]   A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening [J].
Allison, JE ;
Tekawa, IS ;
Ransom, LJ ;
Adrain, AL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (03) :155-159
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, AJCC cancer staging manual, Vfifth
[5]   Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy S. ;
Edwards, Rob ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Hart, Andrew R. ;
Northover, John M. A. ;
Parkin, D. Max ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) :1624-1633
[6]   Sensitivity of latex agglutination faecal occult blood test in the Florence District population-based colorectal cancer screening programme [J].
Castiglione, G. ;
Visioli, C. B. ;
Ciatto, S. ;
Grazzini, G. ;
Bonanomi, A. G. ;
Rubeca, T. ;
Mantellini, P. ;
Zappa, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 96 (11) :1750-1754
[7]   PREVALENCE OF POLYPS IN AN AUTOPSY SERIES FROM AREAS WITH VARYING INCIDENCE OF LARGE-BOWEL CANCER [J].
CLARK, JC ;
COLLAN, Y ;
EIDE, TJ ;
ESTEVE, J ;
EWEN, S ;
GIBBS, NM ;
JENSEN, OM ;
KOSKELA, E ;
MACLENNAN, R ;
SIMPSON, JG ;
STALSBERG, H ;
ZARIDZE, DG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1985, 36 (02) :179-186
[8]   Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated fecal occult blood test in the Netherlands [J].
Denters, Maaike J. ;
Deutekom, Marije ;
Fockens, Paul ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. ;
Dekker, Evelien .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 9
[9]   Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population [J].
Graser, A. ;
Stieber, P. ;
Nagel, D. ;
Schaefer, C. ;
Horst, D. ;
Becker, C. R. ;
Nikolaou, K. ;
Lottes, A. ;
Geisbuesch, S. ;
Kramer, H. ;
Wagner, A. C. ;
Diepolder, H. ;
Schirra, J. ;
Roth, H. J. ;
Seidel, D. ;
Goeke, B. ;
Reiser, M. F. ;
Kolligs, F. T. .
GUT, 2009, 58 (02) :241-248
[10]   Comparison of a guaiac based and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average risk population [J].
Guittet, L. ;
Bouvier, V. ;
Mariotte, N. ;
Vallee, J. P. ;
Arsene, D. ;
Boutreux, S. ;
Tichet, J. ;
Launoy, G. .
GUT, 2007, 56 (02) :210-214