Assessment of soil erodibility indices for Conservation Reserve Program lands in southwestern Kansas using satellite imagery and GIS techniques

被引:11
作者
Park, S [1 ]
Egbert, SL
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Hilo, HI 96720 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Geog, Lawrence, KS 66047 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Kansas Appl Remote Sensing Program, Lawrence, KS 66047 USA
关键词
Conservation Reserve Program; soil erodibility index; GIS; soil properties;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-003-0309-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The soil erodibility index (EI) of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands, which was the major criterion for CRP enrollment, was assessed for six counties in southwestern Kansas using USGS seamless digital elevation model data and Geographical Informational System techniques. The proportion of land areas with EI values of 8 or lower was less than 1% of the entire study area and most of the land areas (72.5%) were concentrated on EI values between 8 and 24. Although land acreage with EI values of 24 or higher decreased dramatically, the proportion of CRP lands to the other land-use types did not change much from low to high EI levels. The soil EI and physical soil characteristics of the CRP lands were compared to those of other land-use types. In general, the mean EI values of the land-use types were strongly correlated with physical soil properties, including organic matter content, clay content, available water capacity, permeability, and texture. CRP lands were compared in detail with cropland in terms of their soil characteristics to infer the pivotal cause of the land transformation. Although there was no significant statistical difference in EI between cropland and CRP soils, soil texture, soil family, and permeability were statistically different between the two. Statistical analyses of these three variables showed that CRP soils had coarser texture and higher permeability on average than cropland soils, indicating that CRP lands in the study area are drier than cropland soils. Therefore, soil moisture characteristics, not necessarily soil erosion potential, might have been the key factor for CRP enrollment in the study area.
引用
收藏
页码:886 / 898
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1978, PREDICTING RAINFALL, DOI DOI 10.1029/TR039I002P00285
  • [2] [Anonymous], CENS AGR
  • [3] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [4] Baer SG, 2000, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V55, P142
  • [5] BAIR B, 1991, KANSAS FARMER, V129, P5
  • [6] CARSON M. A., 1972, Hillslope Form and Process.
  • [7] Davis J.C., 2015, Statistics and data analysis in Geology, V3rd
  • [8] GIS-BASED SIMULATION OF EROSION AND DEPOSITION PATTERNS IN AN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE - A COMPARISON OF MODEL RESULTS WITH SOIL MAP INFORMATION
    DESMET, PJJ
    GOVERS, G
    [J]. CATENA, 1995, 25 (1-4) : 389 - 401
  • [9] Desmet PJJ, 1996, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V51, P427
  • [10] DIEBEL PJL, 1993, 690 AGR EXP STAT