Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias

被引:59
作者
Chootrakool, Hathaikan [2 ]
Shi, Jian Qing [1 ]
Yue, Rongxian [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Suan Dusit Rajabhat Univ, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Shanghai Normal Univ, Coll Math & Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ, Inst E, Div Sci Computat, Shanghai 200041, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Univ, Sci Comp Key Lab, Shanghai 200041, Peoples R China
关键词
heterogeneity; meta-analysis; mixed treatment comparisons; multi-arm trials; selection bias; sensitivity analysis; MIXED TREATMENT COMPARISONS; PUBLICATION BIAS; COMPETING INTERVENTIONS; RATES;
D O I
10.1002/sim.4143
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Multi-arm trials meta-analysis is a methodology used in combining evidence based on a synthesis of different types of comparisons from all possible similar studies and to draw inferences about the effectiveness of multiple compared-treatments. Studies with statistically significant results are potentially more likely to be submitted and selected than studies with non-significant results; this leads to false-positive results. In meta-analysis, combining only the identified selected studies uncritically may lead to an incorrect, usually over-optimistic conclusion. This problem is known as selection bias. In this paper, we first define a random-effect meta-analysis model for multi-arm trials by allowing for heterogeneity among studies. This general model is based on a normal approximation for empirical log-odds ratio. We then address the problem of publication bias by using a sensitivity analysis and by defining a selection model to the available data of a meta-analysis. This method allows for different amounts of selection bias and helps to investigate how sensitive the main interest parameter is when compared with the estimates of the standard model. Throughout the paper, we use binary data from Antiplatelet therapy in maintaining vascular patency of patients to illustrate the methods. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1198
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
*ATC, 1994, BRIT MED J, V308, P159
[2]   The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bucher, HC ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Griffith, LE ;
Walter, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) :683-691
[3]   Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses [J].
Carpenter, James R. ;
Schwarzer, Guido ;
Ruecker, Gerta ;
Kuenstler, Rita .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (06) :624-631
[4]  
CHOOTRAKOOL H, 2008, OPEN MED INFORM J, V64, P221
[5]  
CHOOTRAKOOL H, 2008, THESIS NEWCASTLE U U
[6]   What works?: selectivity models and meta-analysis [J].
Copas, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1999, 162 :95-109
[7]  
Copas J, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P247, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
[8]   Reanalysis of epidemiological evidence on lung cancer and passive smoking [J].
Copas, JB ;
Shi, JQ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7232) :417-418
[9]   A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews [J].
Copas, JB ;
Shi, JQ .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (04) :251-265
[10]   EFFECT OF POSITIVE FINDINGS ON SUBMISSION AND ACCEPTANCE RATES - A NOTE ON METAANALYSIS BIAS [J].
COURSOL, A ;
WAGNER, EE .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1986, 17 (02) :136-137