New method for the direct determination of dissolved Fe(III) concentration in acid mine waters

被引:122
作者
To, TB [1 ]
Nordstrom, DK [1 ]
Cunningham, KM [1 ]
Ball, JW [1 ]
McCleskey, RB [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es980684z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A new method for direct determination of dissolved Fe(III) in acid mine water has been developed. In most present methods, Fe(III) is determined by computing the difference between total dissolved Fe and dissolved Fe(II). For acid mine waters, frequently Fe(II)>> Fe(III); thus, accuracy and precision are considerably improved by determining Fe(III) concentration directly. The new method utilizes two selective ligands to stabilize Fe(III) and Fe(II), thereby preventing changes in Fe reduction-oxidation distribution. Complexed Fe(II) is cleanly removed using a silica-based, reversed-phase adsorbent, yielding excellent isolation of the Fe(III) complex. Iron(III) concentration is measured colorimetrically or by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS). The method requires inexpensive commercial reagents and simple procedures that can be used in the field. Calcium(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), Al(III), Zn(II), and Cd(II) cause insignificant colorimetric interferences for most acid mine waters. Waters containing >20 mg of Cu/L could cause a colorimetric interference and should be measured by GFAAS. Cobalt(II) and Cr(III) interfere if their molar ratios to Fe(III) exceed 24 and 5, respectively. Iron(II)interferes when its concentration exceeds the capacity of the complexing ligand (14 mg/L). Because of the GFAAS elemental specificity, only Fe(II) is a potential interferent in the GFAAS technique. The method detection limit is 2 mu g/L (40 nM) using GFAAS and 20 mu g/L (0.4 mu M) by colorimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 813
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   SELECTIVE DETERMINATION OF IRON BY FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING OF A NATURALLY-OCCURRING PIGMENT [J].
ASKELAND, RA ;
SKOGERBOE, RK .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1987, 192 (02) :133-143
[2]  
Ball JW, 1994, 934122 USGS
[3]  
BALL JW, 1989, 894138 USGS US GEOL
[4]   SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF IRON AND COBALT WITH FERROZINE AND DITHIZONE [J].
DAWSON, MV ;
LYLE, SJ .
TALANTA, 1990, 37 (12) :1189-1191
[5]  
Greenberg A. E., 1992, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[6]  
Hider R C, 1991, Prog Med Chem, V28, P41, DOI 10.1016/S0079-6468(08)70363-1
[7]   SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC CATALYTIC DETERMINATION OF AN ULTRATRACE AMOUNT OF IRON(III) IN WATER BASED ON THE OXIDATION OF N,N-DIMETHYL-P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE BY HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE [J].
HIRAYAMA, K ;
UNOHARA, N .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1988, 60 (23) :2573-2577
[8]   FILTER PORE-SIZE EFFECTS ON ANALYSIS OF AL, FE, MN, AND TI IN WATER [J].
KENNEDY, VC ;
ZELLWEGER, GW ;
JONES, BF .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1974, 10 (04) :785-790
[9]   EFFECTS OF COLLOIDS ON METAL TRANSPORT IN A RIVER RECEIVING ACID-MINE DRAINAGE, UPPER ARKANSAS RIVER, COLORADO, USA [J].
KIMBALL, BA ;
CALLENDER, E ;
AXTMANN, EV .
APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 1995, 10 (03) :285-306
[10]  
Martell A. E., 1976, Critical Stability Constants