Creating a bigger bath using the deferred tax valuation allowance

被引:37
作者
Christensen, Theodore E. [1 ]
Paik, Gyung H. [1 ]
Stice, Earl K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Marriott Sch Management, Sch Accountancy, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
deferred taxes; valuation allowance; big bath; earnings management;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02092.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The provisions of SFAS No. 109 allow US companies to make an earnings big bath even bigger through the establishment of a deferred tax valuation allowance. At the time a firm recognizes a non-cash charge, it also recognizes a deferred tax asset to represent the future tax benefits of the charge. Recognition of the deferred tax asset partially mitigates the negative earnings impact of the special charge. However, if the firm does not expect to have sufficient future taxable income to utilize the future tax benefits of the charge, SFAS No. 109 requires the firm to establish a deferred tax valuation allowance, effectively eliminating the recognized deferred tax asset. Thus, the establishment of the valuation allowance amplifies the negative earnings impact of the non-cash charge. We use a valuation allowance prediction model to identify firms that create a larger-than-expected valuation allowance; these firms may be creating a large valuation allowance as a reserve to be used to manage earnings in a subsequent period. We find that the vast majority of these larger-than-expected valuation allowances apparently reflect informed management pessimism about the future in that these firms actually do have poorer operating performance in subsequent periods. We do not find any evidence that subsequent reversals of valuation allowances are used to turn a loss into a profit. However, we do find a very small number of firms that appear to have used a valuation allowance reversal to meet or beat the mean analyst forecast.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 625
页数:25
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY
    ALTMAN, EI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) : 589 - 609
  • [2] Arnold A. J., 1994, J BUSINESS FINANCE A, V21, P875
  • [3] BAUMAN C, 2004, J BUSINESS FINANCE A, V31, P1223
  • [4] Bauman C.C., 2001, Journal of the American Taxation Association, V23, P27, DOI DOI 10.2308/JATA.2001.23.S-1.27
  • [5] Behn B., 1998, ACCOUNT HORIZ, V12, P63
  • [6] Brown S, 1987, J BUSINESS FINANCE A, V14, P121
  • [7] Burgstahler D., 2002, How firms avoid losses: Evidence of the use of the net deferred tax asset account
  • [8] Burgstahler DC, 1997, ACCOUNT REV, V72, P187
  • [9] DECHOW PM, 1995, ACCOUNT REV, V70, P193
  • [10] *FASB, 1992, 109 FASB STAT FIN AC