Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives

被引:138
作者
Boivin, Antoine [1 ]
Currie, Kay [2 ]
Fervers, Beatrice [3 ]
Gracia, Javier [4 ]
James, Marian [5 ]
Marshall, Catherine
Sakala, Carol [6 ]
Sanger, Sylvia [7 ]
Strid, Judi [8 ]
Thomas, Victoria [9 ]
van der Weijden, Trudy [10 ]
Grol, Richard [1 ]
Burgers, Jako [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Med, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Natl Hlth & Med Res Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Lyon, Ctr Leon Berard, Lyon, France
[4] Unidad Evaluac Tecnol Sanitarias, Madrid, Spain
[5] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Childbirth Connect, New York, NY USA
[7] Agcy Qual Med, Berlin, Germany
[8] Natl Consumer Advocacy Serv, Auckland, New Zealand
[9] Natl Inst Hlth & Clin Excellence, London, England
[10] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2010年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
DECISION AIDS; HEALTH-CARE; PREFERENCES; PARTICIPATION; PROGRAMS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2009.034835
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are important tools for improving patient care. Patient and public involvement is recognised as an essential component of CPG development and implementation, The Guideline International Network Patient and Public Involvement Working Group (G-I-N PUBLIC) aims to support the development, implementation and evaluation of guideline-oriented patient and public involvement programmes (PPIPs). Objective To develop an international practice and research agenda on patient and public involvement in CPG. Method 56 CPG developers, researchers, and patient/public representatives from 14 different countries, were consulted in an international workshop. Recommendations were validated with G-I-N PUBLIC steering committee members. Results Many CPG organisations have set up PPIPs that use a range of participation, consultation and communication methods. Current PPIPs aim to improve the quality and responsiveness of CPGs to public expectations and needs, or to foster individual healthcare decisions. Some organisations use structured involvement methods, including providing training for patient and public representatives. A number of financial, organisational and sociopolitical barriers limit patient and public involvement. The paucity of process and impact evaluations limits our current understanding of the conditions under which patient and public involvement is most likely to be effective. Conclusion Greater international collaboration and research are needed to strengthen existing knowledge, development and evaluation of patient and public involvement in CPG.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abelson J., 2006, ASSESSING IMPACTS PU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GLOB PROGR EV HLTH P
[3]  
[Anonymous], RES POLICY
[4]   Raising the standard: Practice guidelines and consumer participation [J].
Bastian, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 8 (05) :485-490
[5]  
BOIVIN A, 2008, 5 INT G I N C 1 3 OC
[6]   Why Consider Patients' Preferences? A Discourse Analysis of Clinical Practice Guideline Developers [J].
Boivin, Antoine ;
Green, Judith ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Legare, France ;
Nolte, Ellen .
MEDICAL CARE, 2009, 47 (08) :908-915
[7]   Towards evidence-based clinical practice:: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs [J].
Burgers, JS ;
Grol, R ;
Klazinga, NS ;
Mäkelä, M ;
Zaat, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 15 (01) :31-45
[8]  
Buse K, 2006, MAKING HLTH POLICY
[9]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[10]  
CARRETIER J, 2007, 4 GUIDL INT NETW C 2