Cytological observations of the infection process by Phomopsis helianthi (Munt.-Cvet) in leaves of sunflower

被引:12
作者
Heller, A
Gierth, K
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Bot 210, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Inst Pflanzenkrankheiten, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY-PHYTOPATHOLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT | 2001年 / 149卷 / 06期
关键词
Phomopsis helianthi; electron microscopy; infection process; sunflower; ultrastructure;
D O I
10.1046/j.1439-0434.2001.00635.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The infection process of Phomopsis helianthi and the specific degradation of infected tissue were studied in detail using light and transmission electron microscopy. In comparison with other vascular pathogens, the infection and degradation process was in some aspects different. The favourite tissue for the pathogen to grow in was the phloem. Parenchymatic cells in and around vascular bundles were extremely sensitive to infection long before hyphae arrived, probably due to a toxin. In the parenchymatic cells the first changes were visible at the chloroplasts where electron-dense material accumulated in the thylakoid space. The chloroplast stroma changed contrast and later the whole cytoplasm also appeared electron dense. In the vascular bundles, first the phloem was destroyed and then hyphae invaded the adjacent mesophyll, the cambium, and finally the vessel elements. In particular, the compact mesophyll of the midvein was severely affected. Vessel elements were lined with electron-dense material and some were filled with flocculent material. Severe wall destruction indicated the action of a complete set of cell wall-degrading enzymes before hyphae entered the tissue; it always started at the innermost wall layer. Wall degradation in vascular tissue and adjacent parenchyma with intercellular spaces was different. Before the degradation of the protoplasts started, the cell walls were completely metabolized and only the secondary walls of the vessels resisted for longer. There were no host-cell reactions visible that could be interpreted as a defence reaction.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 357
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 19 SUNFL RES WORKS
[2]   ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF VIRUS-INFECTED SUNFLOWER LEAVES [J].
ARNOTT, HJ ;
SMITH, KM .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH, 1967, 19 (1-2) :173-&
[3]   Specifying the introgressed regions from H-argophyllus in cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) to mark Phomopsis resistance genes [J].
Besnard, G ;
Griveau, Y ;
Quillet, MC ;
Serieys, H ;
Lambert, P ;
Vares, D ;
Berville, A .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1997, 94 (01) :131-138
[4]   CYTOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS OF EARLY INFECTION PROCESS BY FUSARIUM-OXYSPORUM F SP RADICIS-LYCOPERSICI IN TOMATO PLANTS [J].
CHAREST, PM ;
OUELLETTE, GB ;
PAUZE, FJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1984, 62 (06) :1232-1244
[5]   Immunocytochemical studies of the infection mechanisms of Botrytis fabae - II. Host cell wall breakdown [J].
Cole, L ;
Dewey, FM ;
Hawes, CR .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1998, 139 (04) :611-622
[6]  
DELORENZO R, 1997, PLANT RELATIONSHIP A, P61
[7]   Micro-heterogeneity of pectins and calcium distribution in the epidermal and cortical parenchyma cell walls of flax hypocotyl [J].
Jauneau, A ;
Quentin, M ;
Driouich, A .
PROTOPLASMA, 1997, 198 (1-2) :9-19
[8]  
MANSFIELD JW, 1981, PHYSIOL PLANT PATHOL, V19, P41
[9]   PHOMOZIN, A PHYTOTOXIN FROM PHOMOPSIS-HELIANTHI, THE CAUSAL AGENT OF STEM CANKER OF SUNFLOWER [J].
MAZARS, C ;
ROSSIGNOL, M ;
AURIOL, P ;
KLAEBE, A .
PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 1990, 29 (11) :3441-3444
[10]   PRODUCTION OF PHOMOZIN IN SUNFLOWER FOLLOWING ARTIFICIAL INOCULATION WITH PHOMOPSIS-HELIANTHI [J].
MAZARS, C ;
CANIVENC, E ;
ROSSIGNOL, M ;
AURIOL, P .
PLANT SCIENCE, 1991, 75 (02) :155-160