An evaluation of interagency monitoring of protected visual environments (IMPROVE) collocated precision and uncertainty estimates

被引:49
作者
Hyslop, Nicole P. [1 ]
White, Warren H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Crocker Nucl Lab, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
uncertainty; collocated; particulate matter; air quality monitoring; measurement error;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.053
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program is a cooperative measurement effort in the United States designed to characterize current visibility and aerosol conditions in scenic areas (primarily National Parks and Forests) and to identify chemical species and emission sources responsible for existing man-made visibility impairment. In 2003 and 2004, the IMPROVE network began operating collocated samplers at several sites to evaluate the precision of its aerosol measurements. This paper presents the precisions calculated from the collocated data according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's guidelines Code of Federal Regulations [CFR, 1997. Revised requirements for designation of reference and equivalent methods for PM(2.5) and ambient air quality surveillance for particulate matter: final rule, 1997. Code of Federal Regulations. Part IV: Environmental Protection Agency, vol. 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58, pp. 71-72. Available from <http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/fr_notices/pm-mon.pdf >]. These values range from 4% for sulfate to 115% for the third elemental carbon fraction. Collocated precision tends to improve with increasing detection rates, is typically better when the analysis is performed on the whole filter instead of just a fraction of the filter, and is better for species that are predominantly in the smaller size fractions. The collocated precisions are also used to evaluate the accuracy of the uncertainty estimates that are routinely reported with the concentrations. For most species, the collocated precisions are worse than the precisions predicted by the reported uncertainties. These discrepancies suggest that some sources of uncertainty are not accounted for or have been underestimated. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2691 / 2705
页数:15
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
DEBELL LJ, 2006, 4 COL STAT U
[2]  
*DRI, 2000, THERM OPT REFL CARB
[3]  
Finlayson-Pitts B. J., 2000, Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere
[4]   PM2.5 speciation trends network:: Evaluation of whole-system uncertainties using data from sites with collocated samplers [J].
Flanagan, JB ;
Jayanty, RKM ;
Rickman, EE ;
Peterson, MR .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2006, 56 (04) :492-499
[5]  
ISO IEC OIML BIPM, 1995, GUID EXPR UNC MEAS
[6]  
Jenkins R., 1999, XRAY FLUORESCENCE SP, V2nd, DOI [10.1002/9781118521014, DOI 10.1002/9781118521014]
[7]   A CYCLONE FOR SIZE-SELECTIVE SAMPLING OF AMBIENT AIR [J].
JOHN, W ;
REISCHL, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 30 (08) :872-876
[8]   Inter-laboratory comparison of air particulate monitoring data [J].
Nejedly, Z ;
Campbell, JL ;
Teesdale, WJ ;
Dlouhy, JF ;
Dann, TF ;
Hoff, RM ;
Brook, JR ;
Wiebe, HA .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1998, 48 (05) :386-397
[9]  
RICE J, 2005, COLLOCATED SPECIATIO
[10]  
Seinfeld J.H., 2016, ATMOS CHEM PHYS