Will land transport infrastructure affect the energy and carbon dioxide emissions performance of China's manufacturing industry?

被引:78
作者
Lin, Boqiang [1 ]
Chen, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Polic, Sch Management, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
China's manufacturing industry; Energy and environmental performance; Land transport infrastructure; Non-radial directional distance function; DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE FUNCTION; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY EVALUATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVITY; INTENSITY; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114266
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions of China's manufacturing industry accounted for 12.8% and 15.5% of the world in 2016, respectively. On the other hand, the construction of land transport infrastructure has become the focal point of the Chinese government recently. However, there is very little literature investigating the influencing mechanism of land transport infrastructure on the energy and environmental efficiency of the sector. Therefore, it is crucial and meaningful to study how the latter is affected by the land transport infrastructure to alleviate global energy and environmental issues. Non-radial directional distance function was used to calculate two indicators measuring energy and carbon dioxide emissions performance in this paper. The panel Tobit model was then applied to focus on factors affecting the performance. The results indicate that land transport infrastructure, economic growth, technological progress, energy prices, industrial structure have significant impacts on the energy and environmental efficiency of China's manufacturing industry. Different from the results at the national level, from a regional perspective, the development of land transport infrastructure in the eastern region plays a negative role in the performance of the manufacturing industry. Finally, some targeted policy recommendations are proposed to improve the policy design of the government.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Achtymichuk DS., 2010, MASTERS ABSTR INT, V49, P173
[2]   Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China's iron and steel industry [J].
An, Runying ;
Yu, Biying ;
Li, Ru ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 226 :862-880
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1951, Studies in Income and Wealth
[4]   IS PUBLIC-EXPENDITURE PRODUCTIVE [J].
ASCHAUER, DA .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1989, 23 (02) :177-200
[5]   The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: Non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output [J].
Barros, Carlos Pestana ;
Managi, Shunsuke ;
Matousek, Roman .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) :1-8
[6]   Prices, technology development and the rebound effect [J].
Birol, F ;
Keppler, JH .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :457-469
[7]   Determinants of long-run regional productivity with geographical spillovers: The role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure [J].
Bronzini, Raffaello ;
Piselli, Paolo .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2009, 39 (02) :187-199
[8]  
Chen S., 2011, China Economic Quarterly, V10, P735, DOI DOI 10.13821/J.CNKI.CEQ.2011.03.012
[9]   'Green' productivity growth in China's industrial economy [J].
Chen, Shiyi ;
Golley, Jane .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 44 :89-98
[10]   Extended Divisia index decomposition of changes in energy intensity: A case of Korean manufacturing industry [J].
Choi, Ki-Hong ;
Oh, Wankeun .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 65 :275-283