Diagnostic limitations of 10 mm thickness single-slice computed tomography for patients with suspected appendicitis

被引:5
作者
Kaidu, Motoki [1 ]
Oyamatu, Manabu [2 ]
Sato, Kenji [2 ]
Saitou, Akira [3 ]
Yamamoto, Satoshi [4 ]
Yoshimura, Norihiko [4 ]
Sasai, Keisuke [4 ]
机构
[1] Sado Gen Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Internal Med, Sado 9521209, Japan
[2] Sado Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Sado 9521209, Japan
[3] Niigata Diagnost Imaging Ctr, Niigata, Japan
[4] Niigata Univ, Dept Radiol, Niigata, Japan
来源
RADIATION MEDICINE | 2008年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词
appendicitis; mass formation; appendiceal cancer; colon cancer; computed tomography;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-007-0196-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of 10 mm thickness single helical computed tomography (CT) examination for confirming the diagnosis of appendicitis or providing a diagnosis other than appendicitis, including underlying periappendical neoplasms. Materials and methods. From April 1, 2001 to March 30, 2005, a total of 272 patients with suspected appendicitis underwent CT examinations. Of the 272 patients, 106 (39%) underwent surgery. Seven CT examinations for seven patients were excluded because of inconsistency of the CT protocol. We therefore reviewed 99 CT images (99 patients) with correlation to surgical-pathological findings to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of CT examinations. We compared the postoperative diagnosis with the preoperative CT report. The final diagnoses were confirmed by macroscopic findings at surgery and pathological evaluations if necessary. Results. Of the 99 patients, 87 had acute appendicitis at surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT were 98.9%, 75.0%, and 96.0%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 96.6% and 90.0%, respectively. Among nine patients in the true-negative category, five had colon cancers; and among three patients in the false-positive category, two had cancer of the cecal-appendiceal region as the underlying disease. Conclusion. CT examination is useful for patients with suspected appendicitis, but radiologists should be aware of the limitation of thick-sliced single helical CT. They should also be aware of the possibility of other diseases, including coincident abdominal neoplasms and underlying cecal-appendiceal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1889, NY Med J
[2]   Appendicitis at the millennium [J].
Birnbaum, BA ;
Wilson, SR .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) :337-348
[3]   SONOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF PERFORATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
BORUSHOK, KF ;
JEFFREY, RB ;
LAING, FC ;
TOWNSEND, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (02) :275-278
[4]   Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis [J].
Eldar, S ;
Nash, E ;
Sabo, E ;
Matter, I ;
Kunin, J ;
Mogilner, JG ;
Abrahamson, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 173 (03) :194-198
[5]  
Fujii Y, 2000, J ULTRAS MED, V19, P409
[6]   Acute appendicitis: Comparison of helical CT diagnosis - Focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material [J].
Jacobs, JE ;
Birnbaum, BA ;
Macari, M ;
Megibow, AJ ;
Israel, G ;
Maki, DD ;
Aguiar, AM ;
Langlotz, CP .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) :683-690
[7]   Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT - A prospective randomized study [J].
Kaiser, S ;
Frenckner, B ;
Jorulf, HK .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (03) :633-638
[8]   Comparison of US and unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis [J].
Keyzer, C ;
Zalcman, M ;
De Maertelaer, V ;
Coppens, E ;
Bali, MA ;
Gevenois, PA ;
Van Gansbeke, D .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (02) :527-534
[9]  
Lally KP, 2004, SABISTON TXB SURG, P1381
[10]   Suspected acute appendicitis: Nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients [J].
Lane, MJ ;
Liu, DM ;
Huynh, MD ;
Jeffrey, RB ;
Mindelzun, RE ;
Katz, DS .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (02) :341-346