A multidisciplinary approach for improving services in primary care: randomised controlled trial of screening for haemoglobin disorders

被引:46
作者
Modell, M [1 ]
Wonke, B
Anionwu, E
Khan, M
Tai, SS
Lloyd, M
Modell, B
机构
[1] Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, Whittington Hosp, London N19 5NF, England
[2] Whittington Hosp Trust, London N19 5NF, England
[3] UCL, Inst Child Hlth, Mothercare Unit Clin Genet & Fetal Med, London WC1N 1EH, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 1998年 / 317卷 / 7161期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.317.7161.788
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: to investigate the feasibility of improving screening for carriers of haemoglobin disorders in general practice by using a nurse facilitator to work with primary care teams and the relevant haematology laboratories; to identify problems in communication between all those involved in delivering the service, and to implement solutions. Design: Two year, practice based randomised controlled trial. Setting North London area where 29% of residents and 43% of births are in ethnic groups at risk for haemoglobin disorders. Subjects: 26 of the 93 practices using the services of the area's haematology laboratory agreed to take part and were randomly divided into control and intervention practices. Main outcome measure: Change in number of requests for screening tests for haemoglobin disorders made by control and intervention practices in baseline and intervention years. Results: the number of screening tests requested varied from 0-150 in the 93 practices in the baseline year. Study practices tended to have made a moderate number of requests (10-50) during this period. During the intervention year intervention practices made 292 more requests (99% increase) and control practices made 74 fewer requests (23% decrease; P = 0.001 for difference in median change). Four practices, three of which were singlehanded, accounted for 75% of the increase. The number of requests from intervention practices, adjusted for baseline requests, was 3.2 times higher than control practices (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: general practitioners and practice nurses ware willing to undertake a new genetic screening service (or expand an existing one) if they are persuaded that it benefits the health of a significant proportion of their practice population. They need appropriate tools (for example, information materials for carriers and groups at risk), and the laboratory must be sensitive to their needs. Preconceptional carrier screening and counselling need to be coupled with antenatal screening.
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 791
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ANGASTINIOTIS M, 1986, World Health Forum, V7, P291
[3]  
Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
[4]  
Bland JM, 1997, BRIT MED J, V315, P600
[5]  
DAVIS DA, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P700
[6]   EVIDENCE FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CME - A REVIEW OF 50 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].
DAVIS, DA ;
THOMSON, MA ;
OXMAN, AD ;
HAYNES, RB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (09) :1111-1117
[7]   CLUSTER RANDOMIZATION TRIALS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY - THEORY AND APPLICATION [J].
DONNER, A ;
KLAR, N .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1994, 42 (1-2) :37-56
[8]   OBSTETRIC ASPECTS OF MIDTRIMESTER FETAL BLOOD-SAMPLING BY NEEDLING OR FETOSCOPY [J].
FAIRWEATHER, DVI ;
WARD, RHT ;
MODELL, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (02) :87-99
[9]  
Haines A, 1996, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V46, P115
[10]  
*HLTH ED AUTH, 1998, SICKL CELL THAL ACH