Modulating effect of lonidamine on response to doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a multicenter prospective randomized trial

被引:50
作者
Amadori, D
Frassineti, GL
De Matteis, A
Mustacchi, G
Santoro, A
Cariello, S
Ferrari, M
Nascimben, O
Nanni, O
Lombardi, A
Scarpi, E
Zoli, W
机构
[1] Osped L Pierantoni, Div Med Oncol, I-47100 Forli, FO, Italy
[2] Fdn Pascale, Ist Tumori, Naples, Italy
[3] Univ Trieste, Div Med Oncol, Trieste, Italy
[4] Osped S Gennaro, Med Oncol Serv, Naples, Italy
[5] Osped San Leonardo, Med Oncol Serv, Salerno, Italy
[6] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Div Med Oncol, Milan, Italy
[7] Osped Umberto 1, Div Radioterapia, Mestre, Italy
[8] Ist Oncol Romagnolo, Forli, Italy
关键词
advanced breast cancer; doxorubicin; lonidamine;
D O I
10.1023/A:1006063412726
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Previous results from our preclinical studies have shown that lonidamine (LND) can positively modulate the antiproliferative activity of doxorubicin (DOX) on breast cancer cell lines. To evaluate the effect of LND in a clinical setting, a multicenter randomized trial was carried out on patients with advanced breast cancer. From September 1991 to July 1993, 181 patients were enrolled in the trial and received an initial treatment of DOX at 75 mg/m(2) for 3 cycles. The 137 patients who reached complete remission, partial remission, or stable disease were randomized to receive either DOX alone (75 mg/m(2) day 1) (arm A) or DOX plus LND (600 mg orally/ day) (arm B). The patients enrolled in the two arms were fairly homogeneous in terms of major clinical characteristics. Toxicity was similar in both arms except for myalgia: WHO grade greater than or equal to 2 was observed in 57% of arm B patients. Overall response rate to DO): + LND was 50% and to DOX alone 38% in evaluable patients, and 48% vs 37% in all registered patients, as determined by an intention-to-treat analysis. The differences did not reach statistical significance. Conversely, in agreement with previous findings, we observed a significant difference in response rate in the subgroup of patients with liver metastases, regardless of the extent of hepatic involvement (DOX + LND 68% vs DOX 33%, p = 0.03). This observation makes LND an important tool in association with anthracyclines in the treatment of this subgroup of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 217
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND PREDNISONE VERSUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, 5-FLUOROURACIL, AND PREDNISONE IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER
    AHMANN, DL
    SCHAID, DJ
    INGLE, JN
    BISEL, HF
    SCHUTT, AJ
    BUCKNER, JC
    LONG, HJ
    RUBIN, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 14 (03): : 179 - 183
  • [2] THE CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE
    BELLAMY, WT
    DALTON, WS
    DORR, RT
    [J]. CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1990, 8 (05) : 547 - 562
  • [3] BENHORIN H, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P2814
  • [4] PHARMACOKINETICS OF LONIDAMINE AFTER ORAL-ADMINISTRATION IN CANCER-PATIENTS
    BESNER, JG
    LECLAIRE, R
    BAND, PR
    DESCHAMPS, M
    DESANCTIS, AJ
    CATANESE, B
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 1984, 41 : 48 - 52
  • [5] BULL JM, 1978, CANCER, V41, P1649, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197805)41:5<1649::AID-CNCR2820410501>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-J
  • [7] CALABRESI F, 1994, INT J ONCOL, V4, P753
  • [8] REVERSAL OF ADRIAMYCIN RESISTANCE BY LONIDAMINE IN A HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELL-LINE
    CITRO, G
    CUCCO, C
    VERDINA, A
    ZUPI, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 64 (03) : 534 - 536
  • [9] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF DOXORUBICIN, BISANTRENE, AND MITOXANTRONE IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY
    COWAN, JD
    NEIDHART, J
    MCCLURE, S
    COLTMAN, CA
    GUMBART, C
    MARTINO, S
    HUTCHINS, LF
    STEPHENS, RL
    VAUGHAN, CB
    OSBORNE, CK
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1991, 83 (15): : 1077 - 1084
  • [10] COMPARISON OF CAF VERSUS CMFP IN METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
    CUMMINGS, FJ
    GELMAN, R
    HORTON, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1985, 3 (07) : 932 - 940