Probabilistic modelling for estimating gas kinetics and decompression sickness risk in pigs during H2 biochemical decompression

被引:7
作者
Fahlman, A [1 ]
Kayar, SR [1 ]
机构
[1] USN, Med Res Ctr, Environm Physiol Dept, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0092-8240(03)00038-7
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We modelled the kinetics of H-2 flux during gas uptake and elimination in conscious pigs exposed to hyperbaric H-2. The model used a physiological description of gas flux fitted to the observed decompression sickness (DCS) incidence in two groups of pigs: untreated controls, and animals that had received intestinal injections of H-2-metabolizing microbes that biochemically eliminated some of the H-2 stored in the pigs' tissues. To analyse H-2 flux during gas uptake, animals were compressed in a dry chamber to 24 atm (ca 88% H-2, 9% He, 2% O-2, 1% N-2) for 30-1440 min and decompressed at 0.9 atm min(-1) (n=70). To analyse H-2 flux during gas elimination, animals were compressed to 24 atm for 3 h and decompressed at 0.45-1.8 atm min(-1) (n=58). Animals were closely monitored for I h post-decompression for signs of DCS. Probabilistic modelling was used to estimate that the exponential time constant during H-2 uptake (tau(in),) and H-2 elimination (tau(out)) were 79 +/- 25 min and 0.76 +/- 0.14 min, respectively. Thus, the gas kinetics affecting DCS risk appeared to be substantially faster for elimination than uptake, which is contrary to customary assumptions of gas uptake and elimination kinetic symmetry. We discuss the possible reasons for this asymmetry, and why absolute values of H-2 kinetics cannot be obtained with this approach. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of Society for Mathematical Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 766
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL REACTIONS IN HUMANS DURING AN OPEN SEA DIVE TO 500 M WITH A HYDROGEN-HELIUM-OXYGEN MIXTURE [J].
ABRAINI, JH ;
GARDETTECHAUFFOUR, MC ;
MARTINEZ, E ;
ROSTAIN, JC ;
LEMAIRE, C .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 76 (03) :1113-1118
[2]  
BALL R, 1995, UNDERSEA HYPERBAR M, V22, P263
[3]   The prevention of compressed air illness [J].
Boycott, AE ;
Damant, GCC ;
Haldane, JS .
JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1908, 8 (03) :342-443
[4]   DECOMPRESSION-INDUCED DECREASE IN NITROGEN ELIMINATION RATE IN AWAKE DOGS [J].
DAOUST, BG ;
SMITH, KH ;
SWANSON, HT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 41 (03) :348-355
[5]   Natural history of severe decompression sickness after rapid ascent from air saturation in a porcine model [J].
Dromsky, DM ;
Toner, CB ;
Survanshi, S ;
Fahlman, A ;
Parker, E ;
Weathersby, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 89 (02) :791-798
[6]   COMBUSTION-RELATED SAFETY ASPECTS OF HYDROGEN IN ENERGY APPLICATIONS [J].
EICHERT, H ;
FISCHER, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 1986, 11 (02) :117-124
[7]   On the likelihood of decompression sickness during H2 biochemical decompression in pigs [J].
Fahlman, A ;
Tikuisis, P ;
Himm, JF ;
Weathersby, PK ;
Kayar, SR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 91 (06) :2720-2729
[8]  
FAHLMAN A, 2001, 0102 NMRC
[9]  
FARKAS A, 1935, ORTHOHYDROGEN PARAHY, P167
[10]   EFFECT OF DECOMPRESSION PER SE ON NITROGEN ELIMINATION [J].
HILLS, BA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 45 (06) :916-921