Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization

被引:869
作者
Bail, Christopher A. [1 ]
Argyle, Lisa P. [2 ]
Brown, Taylor W. [1 ]
Bumpus, John P. [1 ]
Chen, Haohan [3 ]
Hunzaker, M. B. Fallin [4 ]
Lee, Jaemin [1 ]
Mann, Marcus [1 ]
Merhout, Friedolin [1 ]
Volfovsky, Alexander [5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Sociol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[4] NYU, Dept Sociol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Stat Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
political polarization; computational social science; social networks; social media; sociology; NETWORKS; FOUNDATIONS; ATTITUDES; LIBERALS; FEATHER; OPINION; BIRDS; NEWS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1804840115
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There is mounting concern that social media sites contribute to political polarization by creating "echo chambers" that insulate people from opposing views about current events. We surveyed a large sample of Democrats and Republicans who visit Twitter at least three times each week about a range of social policy issues. One week later, we randomly assigned respondents to a treatment condition in which they were offered financial incentives to follow a Twitter bot for 1 month that exposed them to messages from those with opposing political ideologies (e.g., elected officials, opinion leaders, media organizations, and nonprofit groups). Respondents were resurveyed at the end of the month to measure the effect of this treatment, and at regular intervals throughout the study period to monitor treatment compliance. We find that Republicans who followed a liberal Twitter bot became substantially more conservative posttreatment. Democrats exhibited slight increases in liberal attitudes after following a conservative Twitter bot, although these effects are not statistically significant. Notwithstanding important limitations of our study, these findings have significant implications for the interdisciplinary literature on political polarization and the emerging field of computational social science.
引用
收藏
页码:9216 / 9221
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Is polarization a myth? [J].
Abramowitz, Alan I. ;
Saunders, Kyle L. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2008, 70 (02) :542-555
[2]  
Achen C. H., 2017, Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ASYMMETRIC POLITICS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, POLIT BEHAV
[5]  
Bail Christopher A., 2016, Terrified: How Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream
[6]   Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook [J].
Bakshy, Eytan ;
Messing, Solomon ;
Adamic, Lada A. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6239) :1130-1132
[7]   Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion [J].
Baldassarri, Delia ;
Gelman, Andrew .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2008, 114 (02) :408-446
[8]   Dynamics of political polarization [J].
Baldassarri, Delia ;
Bearman, Peter .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (05) :784-811
[9]   Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data [J].
Barbera, Pablo .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 23 (01) :76-91
[10]   A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication [J].
Bennett, W. Lance ;
Iyengar, Shanto .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2008, 58 (04) :707-731