An analysis of corporate environmental responsibility on the global corporate Web sites and their dialogic principles

被引:23
作者
Kim, Daejoong [1 ]
Nam, Yoonjae [1 ]
Kang, Sinuk [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Commun, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Westfield State Coll, Dept Commun, Westfield, MA 01085 USA
关键词
Corporate environmental responsibility; Dialogic principles; Environmental concerns; 2008 Fortune 500 Global corporations; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.04.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigated how corporations use their Web sites as a way of helping to build corporate environmental responsibility. A content analysis of 2008 Fortune Global corporate Web sites compared environmental concerns and the use of dialogic principles across three regions (i.e., Asia, Europe, and North America). Results show that about 71% of Web sites have a stand-alone environmental menu as a central location for environmental information, and that Europe is the highest, followed by North America and Asia. The environmental concerns of 'resources/waste management' and 'climate changes' are more commonly highlighted than are 'ecosystem' and 'environmental governance.' Furthermore, most Web sites do not fully employ dialogic features, regardless of region. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 288
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]   Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites [J].
Capriotti, Paul ;
Moreno, Angeles .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2007, 33 (01) :84-91
[2]   Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? [J].
Esrock, SL ;
Leichty, GB .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 1998, 24 (03) :305-319
[3]   Community college web sites as tools for fostering dialogue [J].
McAllister, Sheila M. ;
Taylor, Maureen .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2007, 33 (02) :230-232
[4]   How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships [J].
Taylor, M ;
Kent, ML ;
White, WJ .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2001, 27 (03) :263-284