Lay understanding of terms used in cancer consultations

被引:133
作者
Chapman, K [1 ]
Abraham, C
Jenkins, V
Fallowfield, L
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Canc Res UK, Psychosocial Oncol Grp, Brighton BN1 9QG, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Sch Social Sci, Ctr Res Hlth & Med, Falmer, E Sussex, England
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pon.673
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
The study assessed lay understanding of terms used by doctors during cancer consultations. Terms and phrases were selected from 50-videotaped consultations and included in a survey of 105 randomly selected people in a seaside resort. The questionnaire included scenarios containing potentially ambiguous diagnostic/prognostic terms, multiple-choice, comprehension questions and figures on which to locate body organs that could be affected by cancer. Respondents also rated how confident they were about their answers. About half the sample understood euphemisms for the metastatic spread of cancer e.g. 'seedlings' and 'spots in the liver' (44 and 55% respectively). Sixty-three per cent were aware that the term 'metastasis' meant that the cancer was spreading but only 52% understood that the phrase 'the tumour is progressing' was not good news. Yet respondents were fairly confident that they understood these terms. Knowledge of organ location varied. For example, 94% correctly identified the lungs but only 46% located the liver. The findings suggest that a substantial proportion of the lay public do not understand phrases often used in cancer consultations and that knowledge of basic anatomy cannot be assumed. Yet high confidence ratings indicate that asking if patients understand is likely to overestimate comprehension. Awareness of the unfamiliarity of the lay population with cancer-related terms could prompt further explanation in cancer-related consultations. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 566
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Alden PA, 2000, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V9, P358
[2]
BINYET S, 1994, DIABETES METAB, V20, P275
[3]
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PATIENTS AND DOCTORS INTERPRETATION OF SOME COMMON MEDICAL TERMS [J].
BOYLE, CM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1970, 2 (5704) :286-+
[4]
Communication with cancer patients: Does it matter? [J].
Butow, PN ;
Dunn, SM ;
Tattersall, MHN .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 1995, 11 (04) :34-38
[5]
*CANC RES CAMP, 2001, CRC CANC STAT MORT U
[6]
Communicating with patients with advanced cancer [J].
Chan, A ;
Woodruff, RK .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 1997, 13 (03) :29-33
[7]
GENERAL INFORMATION TAPES INHIBIT RECALL OF THE CANCER CONSULTATION [J].
DUNN, SM ;
BUTOW, PN ;
TATTERSALL, MHN ;
JONES, QJ ;
SHELDON, JS ;
TAYLOR, JJ ;
SUMICH, MD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (11) :2279-2285
[8]
CANCER BY ANOTHER NAME - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE EFFECTS OF EUPHEMISM AND UNCERTAINTY IN COMMUNICATING WITH CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
DUNN, SM ;
PATTERSON, PU ;
BUTOW, PN ;
SMARTT, HH ;
MCCARTHY, WH ;
TATTERSALL, MHN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (05) :989-996
[9]
Truth sometimes hurts but deceit hurts more [J].
Fallowfield, L .
COMMUNICATION WITH THE CANCER PATIENT: INFORMATION AND TRUTH, 1997, 809 :525-536
[10]
Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Fallowfield, L ;
Jenkins, V ;
Farewell, V ;
Saul, J ;
Duffy, A ;
Eves, R .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9307) :650-656