Morbidity and mortality after stroke, eprosartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention -: Principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES)

被引:571
作者
Schrader, J
Lüders, S
Kulschewski, A
Hammersen, F
Plate, K
Berger, J
Zidek, W
Dominiak, P
Diener, HC
机构
[1] St Josefs Hosp, Med Klin, Dept Internal Med, D-49661 Cloppenburg, Germany
[2] Inst Hypertens & Cardiovasc Res, Cloppenburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Dept Nephrol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Lubeck, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Lubeck, Germany
[6] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Neurol, Essen, Germany
关键词
eprosartan; hypertension; nitrendipine; stroke prevention;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.0000166048.35740.a9
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-In hypertensive stroke patients, for the same level of blood pressure control, eprosartan will be more effective than nitrendipine in reducing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Methods-A total of 1405 well-defined, high-risk hypertensives with cerebral event during the last 24 months ( proven by cerebral computed tomography scan or nuclear magnetic resonance) were randomized to eprosartan or nitrendipine (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Primary end point was the composite of total mortality and all cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, including all recurrent events. Results-Randomization was successful without significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Blood pressure was reduced to a comparable extent without any significant differences between the 2 groups during the whole study period (150.7/84 mm Hg and 152.0/87.2 mm Hg with eprosartan and nitrendipine therapy to 137.5/80.8 mm Hg and 136.0/80.2 mm Hg, respectively, confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring). Moreover, already after 3 months, normotensive mean values were achieved, and 75.5% reached values <140/90 mm Hg with the eprosartan regimen and 77.7% with the nitrendipine regimen. During follow-up, in total, 461 primary events occurred: 206 eprosartan and 255 nitrendipine (incidence density ratio [IDR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.96; P = 0.014). Cardiovascular events were: 77 eprosartan and 101 nitrendipine (IDR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02; P = 0.06); cerebrovascular events: 102 eprosartan and 134 nitrendipine ( IDR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97; P = 0.03). Conclusions-The Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared With Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention (MOSES) study was the first to compare an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist with a calcium antagonist in secondary stroke prevention. In these high-risk hypertensive stroke patients, an early normotensive and comparable blood pressure was achieved. The combined primary end point was significantly lower in the eprosartan group.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1224
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   RECOVERY OF MOTOR FUNCTION AFTER STROKE [J].
BONITA, R ;
BEAGLEHOLE, R .
STROKE, 1988, 19 (12) :1497-1500
[2]   Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE):: a randomised trial against atenolol [J].
Dahlöf, B ;
Devereux, RB ;
Kjeldsen, SE ;
Julius, S ;
Beevers, G ;
de Faire, U ;
Fyhrquist, F ;
Ibsen, H ;
Kristiansson, K ;
Lederballe-Pedersen, O ;
Lindholm, LH ;
Nieminen, MS ;
Omvik, P ;
Oparil, S ;
Wedel, H .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9311) :995-1003
[3]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[4]  
Hansson L, 1992, Blood Press, V1, P113, DOI 10.3109/08037059209077502
[5]   Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial [J].
Julius, S ;
Kjeldsen, SE ;
Weber, M ;
Brunner, HR ;
Ekman, S ;
Hansson, L ;
Hua, TS ;
Laragh, J ;
McInnes, GT ;
Mitchell, L ;
Plat, F ;
Schork, A ;
Smith, B ;
Zanchetti, A .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9426) :2022-2031
[6]  
KLEINBAU DG, 1982, EPIDEMIOLOGIC RES PR
[7]  
MAHONEY F I, 1965, Md State Med J, V14, P61
[8]  
PROGRESS Collaborat Grp, 2001, LANCET, V358, P1556, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06178-5
[9]  
Schrader J, 1998, BASIC RES CARDIOL, V93, P69
[10]   The ACCESS study -: Evaluation of acute candesartan cilexetil therapy in stroke survivors [J].
Schrader, J ;
Lüders, S ;
Kulschewski, A ;
Berger, J ;
Zidek, W ;
Treib, J ;
Einhäupl, K ;
Diener, HC ;
Dominiak, P .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (07) :1699-1703