A randomised, 52-week, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine when administered as add-on to glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes

被引:338
作者
Rosenstock, J. [1 ]
Davies, M. [2 ]
Home, P. D. [3 ]
Larsen, J. [4 ]
Koenen, C. [4 ]
Schernthaner, G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Dallas Diabet & Endocrine Ctr Med City, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
[2] Univ Leicester, Cardiovasc Sci Dept, Leicester, Leics, England
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Novo Nordisk AS, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark
[5] Rudolfstiftung Hosp Vienna, Dept Med, Vienna, Austria
关键词
body weight; fasting plasma glucose; glucose variability; glucose control; hypoglycaemia; insulin detemir; insulin glargine; insulin supplementation; oral glucose-lowering agents; type; 2; diabetes;
D O I
10.1007/s00125-007-0911-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims/hypothesis This 52-week multinational, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial compared clinical outcomes following supplementation of oral glucose-lowering drugs with basal insulin analogues detemir and glargine in type 2 diabetic patients. Methods Insulin-naive adults (n = 582, HbA(1c) 7.5-10.0%, BMI <= 40.0 kg/m(2)) were randomised 1:1 to receive insulin detemir or glargine once daily (evening) actively titrated to target fasting plasma glucose (FPG)<= 6.0 mmol/l. An additional morning insulin detemir dose was permitted if pre-dinner plasma glucose (PG) was > 7.0 mmol/l after achieving FP<7.0 mmol/l. Due to labelling restrictions, no second glargine dose was allowed. Results Baseline HbA(1c) decreased from 8.6 to 7.2 and 7.1% (NS) with detemir and glargine, respectively. FPG improved from 10.8 to 7.1 and 7.0 mmol/l (NS), respectively. With detemir, 45% of participants completed the study on once daily dosing and 55% on twice daily dosing, with no difference in HbA(1c). Overall, 52% of participants achieved HbA(1c)<= 7.0%: 33% (detemir) and 35% (glargine) without hypoglycaemia. Within-participant variability for self-monitored FPG and pre-dinner PG did not differ by insulin treatment, nor did the relative risk of overall or nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Modest reductions in weight gain were seen with detemir vs glargine in completers (3.0 vs 3.9 kg, p = 0.01) and in the intention-to-treat population (2.7 vs 3.5 kg, p = 0.03), primarily related to completers on once-daily detemir. Mean daily detemir dose was higher (0.78 U/kg [0.52 with once daily dosing, 1.00 U/kg with twice daily dosing]) than glargine (0.44 IU/kg). Injection site reactions were more frequent with detemir (4.5 vs 1.4%). Conclusions Supplementation of oral agents with detemir or glargine achieves clinically important improvements in glycaemic control with low risk of hypoglycaemia. Non-inferiority was demonstrated for detemir using higher insulin doses (mainly patients on twice daily dosing); weight gain was somewhat reduced with once daily insulin detemir.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 416
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   The reality of glycaemic control in insulin treated diabetes: defining the clinical challenges [J].
Davies, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2004, 28 (Suppl 2) :S14-S22
[2]   Therapy in type 2 diabetes: Insulin glargine vs. 2 NPH insulin both in combination with glimepiride [J].
Eliaschewitz, FG ;
Calvo, C ;
Valbuena, H ;
Ruiz, M ;
Aschner, P ;
Villena, J ;
Ramirez, LA ;
Jimenez, J .
ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 37 (04) :495-501
[3]   Lower within-subject variability of fasting blood glucose and reduced weight gain with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes [J].
Haak, T ;
Tiengo, A ;
Draeger, E ;
Suntum, M ;
Waldhäusl, W .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2005, 7 (01) :56-64
[4]   Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes [J].
Heise, T ;
Nosek, L ;
Ronn, BB ;
Endahl, L ;
Heinemann, L ;
Kapitza, C ;
Draeger, E .
DIABETES, 2004, 53 (06) :1614-1620
[5]   Does insulin detemir have a role in reducing risk of insulin-associated weight gain? [J].
Hermansen, K. ;
Davies, M. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2007, 9 (03) :209-217
[6]   A 26-week, randomized, parallel, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin as add-on therapy to oral glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes [J].
Hermansen, Kjeld ;
Davies, Melanie ;
Derezinski, Taudeusz ;
Ravn, Gabrielle Martinez ;
Clauson, Per ;
Home, Philip .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (06) :1269-1274
[7]   Insulin detemir: from concept to clinical experience [J].
Home, P ;
Kurtzhals, P .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2006, 7 (03) :325-343
[8]   Albumin-bound basal insulin analogues (insulin detemir and NN344): comparable time-action profiles but less variability than insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes [J].
Klein, O. ;
Lynge, J. ;
Endahl, L. ;
Damholt, B. ;
Nosek, L. ;
Heise, T. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2007, 9 (03) :290-299
[9]   Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among U.S adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes - A preliminary report [J].
Koro, CE ;
Boialin, SJ ;
Bourgeois, N ;
Fedder, DO .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (01) :17-20
[10]   When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin [J].
Korytkowski, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2002, 26 (Suppl 3) :S18-S24