Pricing and allocation for quality-differentiated online services

被引:12
作者
Bapna, R [1 ]
Goes, P
Gupta, A
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Sch Business, Dept Operat & Informat Management, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Dept Informat & Decis Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
quality-of-service-oriented digital services; auctions to reveal valuations of one-time services; nonstandard knapsack formulation;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1050.0419
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We explore the problem of pricing and allocation of unique, one-time digital products in the form of data streams. We look at the short-term problem where the firm has a capacitated shared resource and multiple products or service levels. We formulate the allocatively efficient Generalized Vickrey Auction (GVA) for our setting and point out the computational challenges in determining the individual discriminatory transfer payments. We propose an alternative uniform-price, computationally efficient, revenue-maximizing knapsack formulation called the Multiple Vickrey Auction.(MVA). While not incentive compatible, the MVA mechanism achieves bounded posterior regret and can be solved in real time. It has the added benefit of realizing imputed commodity prices for the various services, a feature lacking in the discriminatory GVA approach. For service providers that are concerned about the incentive compatibility but want imputed service prices, we suggest a maximal MVA (mMVA) uniform-pricing scheme that trades off revenue maximization for allocative efficiency. For sake of completeness we discuss the properties of a first-price pay-your-bid scheme. While NP-hard and not incentive compatible, this formulation has the perceived benefit of cognitive simplicity on the parts of sellers and bidders.
引用
收藏
页码:1141 / 1150
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A greedy genetic algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem [J].
Ahuja, RK ;
Orlin, JB ;
Tiwari, A .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (10) :917-934
[2]   An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects [J].
Ausubel, LM .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (05) :1452-1475
[3]   Analysis and design of business-to-consumer online auctions [J].
Bapna, R ;
Goes, P ;
Gupta, A .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (01) :85-101
[4]   A theoretical and empirical investigation of multi‐item on‐line auctions [J].
Ravi Bapna ;
Paulo Goes ;
Alok Gupta .
Information Technology and Management, 2000, 1 (1-2) :1-23
[5]   Competitive equilibrium in an exchange economy with indivisibilities [J].
Bikhchandani, S ;
Mamer, JW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1997, 74 (02) :385-413
[6]   The package assignment model [J].
Bikhchandani, S ;
Ostroy, JM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2002, 107 (02) :377-406
[7]  
Clarke E, 1971, Public Choice, V11, P17, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01726210
[8]   Combinatorial auctions: A survey [J].
de Vries, S ;
Vohra, RV .
INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2003, 15 (03) :284-309
[9]  
Foley D., 1967, Yale Economic Essays, P45, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203009826
[10]   EXTERNALITIES AND ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION [J].
GREENWOOD, J ;
MCAFEE, RP .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1991, 106 (01) :103-121