Modelling CO2 effects on wheat with varying nitrogen supplies

被引:82
作者
Jamieson, PD
Berntsen, J
Ewert, F
Kimball, BA
Olesen, JE
Pinter, PJ
Porter, JR
Semenov, MA
机构
[1] New Zealand Inst Crop & Food Res Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Dept Crop Physiol & Soil Sci, Tjele 8830, Denmark
[3] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Agr Sci, Taastrup, Denmark
[4] USDA ARS, US Water Conservat Lab, Phoenix, AZ USA
[5] Univ Bristol, Dept Agr Sci, IACR, Long Ashton Res Stn, Bristol BS41 9AF, Avon, England
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
simulation; canopy; grain; photosynthesis; light-use efficiency;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00214-0
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Crop simulation models are an essential tool for testing whether predicted global atmospheric changes are likely to have impact on food production. Any confidence in model predictions must be based on their ability successfully to predict performance in experiments. Accordingly, the predictions of three daily time step wheat simulation models (AFRCWHEAT2, FASSET and Sirius) were tested against data from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) experiments in AZ in which the amount of applied N and the atmospheric CO2 concentration were both varied. Although there were differences between predicted and observed yields, all the three models predicted yield trends with treatments very similar to those observed. They all predicted, both in absolute terms and in the magnitude of responses, very similar effects of the variations on green area index (GAI), shoot and grain biomass accumulation. and shoot and grain biomass yield to observations and to each other. Comparison of simulated and observed results showed that CO2 effects were expressed through effects on light use efficiency (LUE), whereas N effects were expressed by causing variations in GAI. The exercise showed that the models used have potential for assessing climate change impacts on wheat production. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   SIMULATION OF SOLUTE LEACHING IN SOILS OF DIFFERING PERMEABILITIES [J].
ADDISCOTT, TM ;
WHITMORE, AP .
SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 1991, 7 (02) :94-102
[2]   CONTRASTING CROP SPECIES RESPONSES TO CO2 AND TEMPERATURE - RICE, SOYBEAN AND CITRUS [J].
BAKER, JT ;
ALLEN, LH .
VEGETATIO, 1993, 104 :239-260
[3]   CARBON-DIOXIDE EFFECTS ON CROP ENERGY-BALANCE - TESTING ECOSYS WITH A FREE-AIR CO2 ENRICHMENT (FACE) EXPERIMENT [J].
GRANT, RF ;
KIMBALL, BA ;
PINTER, PJ ;
WALL, GW ;
GARCIA, RL ;
LAMORTE, RL ;
HUNSAKER, DJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1995, 87 (03) :446-457
[4]   Towards an explanation of crop nitrogen demand based on the optimization of leaf nitrogen per unit leaf area [J].
Grindlay, DJC .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1997, 128 :377-396
[5]  
GROSSMAN S, 1995, J BIOGEOGR, V22, P3427
[6]   SIMULATION OF NITROGEN DYNAMICS AND BIOMASS PRODUCTION IN WINTER-WHEAT USING THE DANISH SIMULATION-MODEL DAISY [J].
HANSEN, S ;
JENSEN, HE ;
NIELSEN, NE ;
SVENDSEN, H .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1991, 27 (2-3) :245-259
[7]   VISUAL QUANTIFICATION OF WHEAT DEVELOPMENT [J].
HAUN, JR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1973, 65 (01) :116-119
[8]   THE FACE PROGRAM [J].
HENDREY, GR ;
KIMBALL, BA .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1994, 70 (1-4) :3-14
[9]  
Jacobsen B. H., 1998, 102 DAN I AGR FISH E
[10]   The role of roots in controlling soil water extraction during drought: an analysis by simulation [J].
Jamieson, PD ;
Ewert, F .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1999, 60 (03) :267-280