Scoring Correction for MMPI-2 Hs Scale with Patients Experiencing a Traumatic Brain Injury: A Test of Measurement Invariance

被引:9
作者
Alkemade, Nathan [1 ]
Bowden, Stephen C. [1 ]
Salzman, Louis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Royal Brisbane Hosp, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; MMPI-2; Measurement invariance; Assessment; Correction procedures; MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY-2; FACTORIAL INVARIANCE; PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS; FIT INDEXES; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY; DEPRESSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/arclin/acu058
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
It has been suggested that MMPI-2 scoring requires removal of some items when assessing patients after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Gass (1991. MMPI-2 interpretation and closed head injury: Acorrection factor. Psychological assessment, 3, 27-31) proposed a correction procedure in line with the hypothesis that MMPI-2 endorsement may be affected by symptoms of TBI. This study assessed the validity of the Gass correction procedure. A sample of patients with a TBI (n = 242), and a random subset of the MMPI-2 normative sample (n = 1,786). The correction procedure implies a failure of measurement invariance across populations. This study examined measurement invariance of one of the MMPI-2 scales (Hs) that includes TBI correction items. A four-factor model of the MMPI-2 Hs items was defined. The factor model was found to meet the criteria for partial measurement invariance. Analysis of the change in sensitivity and specificity values implied by partial measurement invariance failed to indicate significant practical impact of partial invariance. Overall, the results support continued use of all Hs items to assess psychological well-being in patients with TBI.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Alfano Dennis P, 1992, Clin Neuropsychol, V6, P134, DOI 10.1080/13854049208401850
[2]  
Arbisi PA, 1999, NEUROREHABILITATION, V13, P117
[3]  
Bachna K, 1998, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V13, P535
[4]   Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology [J].
Bandalos, Deborah L. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (02) :211-240
[5]  
Bontempo D.E., 2007, OXFORD HDB METHODS P, P153
[6]   When does measurement invariance matter? Commentary [J].
Borsboom, Denny .
MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (11) :S176-S181
[7]  
Brown T. A., 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[8]   Validity of the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 correction factors for use with patients with suspected head injury [J].
Brulot, MM ;
Strauss, E ;
Spellacy, F .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 11 (04) :391-401
[9]  
Butcher J.N., 2006, MMPI -2: A practitioner's guide
[10]  
Byrne B.M., 1998, STRUCTURAL EQUATION, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203774762