Variation in elective primary cesarean delivery by patient and hospital factors

被引:36
作者
Gregory, KD
Korst, LM
Platt, LD
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Burna & Allen Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Div Maternal Fetal Med & Womens Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
cesarean; practice variation; quality of care; recursive partitioning; risk adjustment;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2001.115496
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to describe variation in elective primary cesarean rates by nonclinical factors. STUDY DESIGN: With use of California discharge data and American Hospital Association data for 1995, patients were classified into 13 mutually exclusive categories for elective primary cesarean delivery. With use of recursive partitioning algorithms, women in each category were then studied to determine whether nonclinical factors were associated with elective primary cesarean delivery. RESULTS: A total of 463,196 women were delivered at 288 hospitals, and the elective primary cesarean delivery rate was 4.25% (19,664/463,196). Risk for elective primary cesarean delivery varied by clinical condition. The most discriminant;risk factors were hospital type (malpresentation, multiple gestation, macrosomia, other hypertension), maternal age (antepartum bleeding, uterine scar, soft tissue disorder, preterm, unspecified), and teaching status (herpes, severe hypertension, unengaged head). CONCLUSION: This article presents methods that use administrative data to isolate and monitor the impact of nonclinical factors on the use of elective primary cesarean.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1534
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*AM HOSP ASS, 1999, ANN SURV AHA GUID
[2]  
*AM MED ASS, 1996, GRAD MED ED DIR 1995
[3]  
[Anonymous], EV CES DEL
[4]   Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance [J].
Aron, DC ;
Harper, DL ;
Shepardson, LB ;
Rosenthal, GE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (24) :1968-1972
[5]   Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates [J].
Bailit, JL ;
Dooley, SL ;
Peaceman, AN .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (06) :1025-1030
[6]   RACIAL ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES IN THE LIKELIHOOD OF CESAREAN DELIVERY, CALIFORNIA [J].
BRAVEMAN, P ;
EGERTER, S ;
EDMONSTON, F ;
VERDON, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (05) :625-630
[7]  
Breiman L., 1984, BIOMETRICS, DOI DOI 10.2307/2530946
[8]   The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate - A more informative method than the cesarean section ''rate'' for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills [J].
Elliott, JP ;
Russell, MM ;
Dickason, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (01) :139-143
[9]   A classification tree analysis of selection for discretionary treatment [J].
Feinglass, J ;
Yarnold, PR ;
McCarthy, WJ ;
Martin, GJ .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (05) :740-747
[10]   Reducing cesarean section rates safely: Lessons from a "breakthrough series" collaborative [J].
Flamm, BL ;
Berwick, DM ;
Kabcenell, A .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1998, 25 (02) :117-124