Combinatorial Life Cycle Assessment to Inform Process Design of Industrial Production of Algal Biodiesel

被引:243
作者
Brentner, Laura B. [1 ]
Eckelman, Matthew J. [1 ]
Zimmerman, Julie B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
EXTRACTION; MICROALGAE; ENERGY; GAS; PHOTOBIOREACTORS; FLOCCULATION; CULTIVATION; BIOREACTORS; EFFICIENCY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1021/es2006995
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of algae as a feedstock for biodiesel production is a rapidly growing industry, in the United States and globally. A life cycle assessment (LCA) is presented that compares various methods, either proposed or under development, for algal biodiesel to inform the most promising pathways for sustainable full-scale production. For this analysis, the system is divided into five distinct process steps: (1) microalgae cultivation, (2) harvesting and/or dewatering, (3) lipid extraction, (4) conversion (transesterification) into biodiesel, and (5) byproduct management. A number of technology options are considered for each process step and various technology combinations are assessed for their life cycle environmental impacts. The optimal option for each process step is selected yielding a best case scenario, comprised of a flat panel enclosed photobioreactor and direct transesterification of algal cells with supercritical methanol. For a functional unit of 10 GJ biodiesel, the best case production system yields a cumulative energy demand savings of more than 65 GJ, reduces water consumption by 585 m(3) and decreases greenhouse gas emissions by 86% compared to a base case scenario typical of early industrial practices, highlighting the importance of technological innovation in algae processing and providing guidance on promising production pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:7060 / 7067
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants [J].
Angelidaki I. ;
Sanders W. .
Re/Views in Environmental Science & Bio/Technology, 2004, 3 (2) :117-129
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CLEAN CIT ALT FUEL P
[3]  
[Anonymous], EC DAT V2 2
[4]   Net Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Evaluation of Biodiesel Derived from Microalgae [J].
Batan, Liaw ;
Quinn, Jason ;
Willson, Bryan ;
Bradley, Thomas .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (20) :7975-7980
[5]  
Benemann J.R., 1996, SYSTEMS EC ANAL MICR
[6]   Commercial production of microalgae: ponds, tanks, tubes and fermenters [J].
Borowitzka, MA .
JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1999, 70 (1-3) :313-321
[7]   Biofuels from microalgae-A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products [J].
Brennan, Liam ;
Owende, Philip .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (02) :557-577
[8]   Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae in ponds [J].
Campbell, Peter K. ;
Beer, Tom ;
Batten, David .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (01) :50-56
[9]   Microalgal reactors: A review of enclosed system designs and performances [J].
Carvalho, Ana P. ;
Meireles, Luis A. ;
Malcata, F. Xavier .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2006, 22 (06) :1490-1506
[10]   Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol [J].
Chisti, Yusuf .
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) :126-131