The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements

被引:166
作者
Fink, B. [1 ]
Makowiak, C. [1 ]
Fuerst, M.
Berger, I.
Schaefer, P.
Frommelt, L.
机构
[1] Orthopaed Clin, Dept Joint Replacement Gen & Rheumat Orthopaed, D-71706 Markgroningen, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2008年 / 90B卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20417
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We analysed the serum C-reactive protein level, synovial fluid obtained by joint aspiration and five synovial biopsies from 145 knee replacements prior to revision to assess the value of these parameters in diagnosing late peri-prosthetic infection. Five further synovial biopsies were used for histological analysis. Samples were also obtained during the revision and incubated and analysed in an identical manner for 14 days. A total of 40 total knee replacements were found to be infected (prevalence 27.6%). The aspiration technique had a sensitivity of 72.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 58.7 to 86.3), a specificity of 95.2% (95% CI 91.2 to 99.2), a positive predictive value of 85.3% (95% CI 73.4 to 100), a negative predictive value of 90.1% (95% CI 84.5 to 95.7) and an accuracy of 89%. The biopsy technique had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 98.1% (95% CI 95.5 to 100), a positive predictive value of 95.2% (95% CI 88.8 to 100), a negative predictive value of 100% and an accuracy of 98.6%. C-reactive protein with a cut-off-point of 13.5 mg/l had a sensitivity of 72.5% (95% CI 58.7 to 86.3), a specificity of 80.9% (95% CI 73.4 to 88.4), a positive predictive value of 59.2% (95% CI 45.4 to 73.0), a negative predictive value of 88.5% (95% 81.0 to 96.0 CI) and an accuracy of 78.1%. We found that biopsy was superior to joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 878
页数:5
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty [J].
Atkins, BL ;
Athanasou, N ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Crook, DWM ;
Simpson, H ;
Peto, TEA ;
McLardy-Smith, P ;
Berendt, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (10) :2932-2939
[2]
A simple, cost-effective screening protocol to rule out periprosthetic infection [J].
Austin, Matthew S. ;
Ghanem, Elie ;
Joshi, Ashish ;
Lindsay, Adam ;
Parvizi, Javad .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (01) :65-68
[3]
Barrack RL, 1997, ORTHOPEDICS, V20, P862
[4]
BARRACK RL, 1997, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V345, P8
[5]
Usefulness of histological analysis for predicting the presence of microorganisms at the time of reimplantation after hip resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection [J].
Bori, Guillem ;
Soriano, Alex ;
Garcia, Sebastian ;
Mallofre, Carme ;
Riba, Josep ;
Mensa, Josep .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (06) :1232-1237
[6]
Technique and timing of two-stage exchange for a infection in TKA [J].
Burnett, R. Stephen J. ;
Kelly, Michael A. ;
Hanssen, Arlen D. ;
Barrack, Robert L. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (464) :164-178
[7]
COSTERTON JW, 2005, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V437, P7
[8]
DELLAVALLE CJ, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V420, P26
[9]
DUFF GP, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V331, P132
[10]
EWALD FC, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P9