Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis

被引:86
作者
AbuRahma, Ali F. [1 ]
Abu-Halimah, Shadi [1 ]
Bensenhaver, Jessica [1 ]
Dean, L. Scott [2 ]
Keiffer, Tammi [2 ]
Emmett, Mary [2 ]
Flaherty, Sarah [2 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Dept Surg, Robert C Byrd Hlth Sci Ctr, Charleston, WV 25304 USA
[2] Charleston Area Med Ctr, Charleston, WV USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The optimal duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity criteria to determine in-stent carotid restenosis are controversial. We previously reported the optimal DUS velocities for >= 30% in-stent restenosis. This prospective study will further define the optimal velocities in detecting various severities of in-stent restenosis: >= 30%, >= 50%, and 80% to 99%. Methods: The analysis included 144 patients who Underwent carotid artery stenting as a part of clinical trials. All patients had completion arteriograms and underwent postoperative carotid DUS imaging, which was repeated at 1 month and every 6 months thereafter. Patients with peak systolic velocities (PSVs) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) of >= 130 cm/s underwent carotid computed tomography (CT)/angiogram. The PSVs and end-diastolic velocities of the ICA and common carotid artery (CCA) and the PSV of the ICA/CCA ratios were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal velocity criteria for the diagnosis of >= 30, >= 50, and >= 80% restenosis. Results: The mean follow-up was 20 months (range, 1-78 months). Available for analysis were 215 pairs of imaging (DUS vs CTA/angiography) studies. The accuracy of CTA vs carotid arteriogram was confirmed in a Subset of 22 patients (kappa=0.81). The ROC analysis demonstrated that an ICA PSV of 2:154 cm/s was optimal for 30% stenosis with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 89%, positive-predictive value (PPV) of 96%, negative-predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and overall accuracy (OA) of 96%. An ICA EDV of 42 cra/s had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting :30% stenosis of 86%, 62%, 87%, 60%, and 80%, respectively. An ICA PSV of >= 224 cm/s was optimal for > 50% stenosis with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 90%, PPV of 99%, NPV of 90%, and OA of 98%. An ICA EDV of 88 cm/s had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting >= 50% stenosis of 96%, 100%,100%,100%, 53%, and 96%. An ICA/CCA ratio of 3.439 had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting >= 50% stenosis of 96%,100%, 100%,100%, 58%, and 96%, respectively. An ICA PSV of 325 cm/s was optimal for > 80% stenosis with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 88%, and OA of 99%. An ICA EDV of 119 cm/sec had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and OA in detecting 2:80% stenosis of 99%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, and 99%, respectively. The PSV of the stented artery was a better predictor for in-stent restenosis than the end-diastolic velocity or ICA/CCA ratio. Conclusion: The optimal DUS velocity criteria for in-stent restenosis of 30%, :50%, and >= 80% were the PSVs of 154, 224, and 325 cm/s, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 594
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials [J].
AbuRahma, AF ;
Robinson, PA ;
Strickler, DL ;
Alberts, S ;
Young, L .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 12 (04) :349-358
[2]   Comparative study of operative treatment and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for recurrent carotid disease [J].
AbuRahma, AF ;
Bates, MC ;
Stone, PA ;
Wulu, TT .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (05) :831-837
[3]   Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis [J].
AbuRahma, Ali F. ;
Maxwell, Damian ;
Eads, Kris ;
Flaherty, Sarah K. ;
Stutler, Tabitha .
VASCULAR, 2007, 15 (03) :119-125
[4]   Helical CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis - Discussion [J].
Reilly, LM ;
Cinat, M ;
Strandness, E ;
Moneta, G .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 28 (02) :297-300
[5]  
Cinat ME, 2003, AM SURGEON, V69, P842
[6]   Carotid angioplasty - In search of a worthy alternative to endarterectomy [J].
Ferguson, RDG ;
Ferguson, JG .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1996, 53 (07) :696-698
[7]   Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: The ARCHeR results [J].
Gray, William A. ;
Hopkins, L. Nelson ;
Yadav, Sanjay ;
Davis, Thomas ;
Wholey, Mark ;
Atkinson, Richard ;
Cremonesi, Alberto ;
Fairman, Ronald ;
Walker, Gary ;
Verta, Patrick ;
Popma, Jeff ;
Virmani, Renu ;
Cohen, David J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 44 (02) :258-268
[8]  
Hobson R W 2nd, 2000, Semin Vasc Surg, V13, P139
[9]   Carotid artery stenting: Analysis of data for 105 patients at high risk [J].
Hobson, RW ;
Lal, BK ;
Chaktoura, E ;
Goldstein, J ;
Haser, PB ;
Kubicka, R ;
Cerveira, J ;
Pappas, PJ ;
Padberg, FT ;
Jamil, Z .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (06) :1234-1239
[10]   Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis:: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Jahromi, AS ;
Cinà, CS ;
Liu, Y ;
Clase, CM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 41 (06) :962-972