Randomized phase III trial comparing the new potent and selective third-generation aromatase inhibitor vorozole with megestrol acetate in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients

被引:83
作者
Goss, PE
Winer, EP
Tannock, IF
Schwartz, LH
机构
[1] Toronto Hosp, Gen Div, Div Hematol Oncol, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Med Oncol Hematol, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.52
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: to compare the efficacy and safety of vorozole (VOR) 2.5 mg once daily with that of megestrol acetate (MA) 40 mg four times per day as second-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer whose disease progressed after tamoxifen treatment, Patients and Methods: A total of 452 patients were enrolled onto an open, multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing VOR to MA for tumor response, safety, and quality of life (as indicated by the Functional Living Index-Cancer score). Results: Vorozole produced a response rate of 9.7%, compared with 6.8% for MA (P = .24). Clinical benefit (complete response + partial response + no change in > 6 months) was demonstrated in 23.5% and 27.2% of patients treated with VOR and MA, respectively (P = .42). Median duration of response was 18.2 months for VOR versus 12.5 months for MA (P = .074). There was no significant difference in time to progression or survival between the treatment groups. Discontinuation of treatment because of adverse events occurred less frequently in the VOR-treated group (3.1% v 6.2%; P = .18). patients on the VOR arm reported significantly more nausea, hot flushes, arthralgia, upper respiratory tract infection, anorexia, and paresthesia, whereas those treated with MA had significantly more dyspnea, increased appetite, and weight increase. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in Functional Living Index-cancer scores (total or subscales). However, when analyzed by objective response, patients with complete or partial responses (P = .032) or no change (P = .033) who were receiving VOR had significant improvement in the psychologic well-being subscale, compared with patients given MA. Conclusion:Vorozole is well tolerated and as effective as MA in the treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients with disease progression after tamoxifen treatment. J Clin Oncol 17:52-63. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 63
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aaronson NK, 1991, EFFECT CANC QUALITY, P185
[2]  
AMOROSO D, 1994, ANN ONCOL S8, V5, P33
[3]  
[Anonymous], WHO PUBL
[4]  
BERGH J, 1997, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V16, pA155
[5]   AROMATASE-ACTIVITY AND ESTRADIOL IN HUMAN BREAST-CANCER - ITS RELATIONSHIP TO ESTRADIOL AND EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTORS AND TO TUMOR-NODE-METASTASIS STAGING [J].
BOLUFER, P ;
RICART, E ;
LLUCH, A ;
VAZQUEZ, C ;
RODRIGUEZ, A ;
RUIZ, A ;
LLOPIS, F ;
GARCIACONDE, J ;
ROMERO, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (03) :438-446
[6]   AROMATASE INHIBITORS - BASIC AND CLINICAL-STUDIES [J].
BRODIE, AMH ;
COOMBES, RC ;
DOWSETT, M .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1987, 27 (4-6) :899-903
[7]   Anastrozole, a potent and selective aromatase inhibitor, versus megestrol acetate in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: Results of overview analysis of two phase III trials [J].
Buzdar, A ;
Jonat, W ;
Howell, A ;
Jones, SE ;
Blomqvist, C ;
Vogel, CL ;
Eiermann, W ;
Wolter, JM ;
Azab, M ;
Webster, A ;
Plourde, PV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (07) :2000-2011
[8]  
BUZDAR A, 1997, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V16, pA156
[9]  
CONGDON J, 1991, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V10, pA93
[10]  
COOMBES RC, 1992, EUR J CANCER, V28A, P1941