Community integration status 4 years after traumatic brain injury - Participant-proxy agreement

被引:12
作者
Dawson, DR
Markowitz, M
Stuss, DT
机构
[1] Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Kunin Lunenfeld Appl Res Unit, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Grad Dept Rehabil Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
community integration; Katz Adjustment Scale; level of agreement; measurement; traumatic brain injury;
D O I
10.1097/00001199-200509000-00004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
objectives: To measure the level of agreement on community integration outcomes 4 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in relation to injury severity, proxy-participant relationship, and type of question. Participants: Thirty-one survivors of TBI (14 with mild TBI and 17 with moderate-severe TBI) and 31 significant other proxies. Measures: General and leisure activity scales of the Katz Adjustment Scale (KAS). Results: Agreement was highest between proxies and participants with mild versus moderate-severe TBIs, between Spouse proxies and TBI participants compared to nonspouse proxies and on the more objective subscales (frequency of participation) compared to the expectation and satisfaction scales regardless of injury severity or proxy-participant relationship. Conclusions: For research purposes, proxy data are acceptable but clinicians should assess outcomes and set goals with input from both persons with TBIs and their proxies.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 435
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Can J Occup Ther
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
[3]   The validity of the Katz Adjustment Scale among people with traumatic brain injury [J].
Baker, KA ;
Schmidt, MF ;
Heinemann, AW ;
Langley, M ;
Miranti, SV .
REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 43 (01) :30-40
[4]   RELIABILITY OF PROXY RESPONSE ON MENTAL-HEALTH INDEXES FOR AGED, COMMUNITY-DWELLING WOMEN [J].
BASSETT, SS ;
MAGAZINER, J ;
HEBEL, JR .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1990, 5 (01) :127-132
[5]  
CAVALLO M M, 1992, Brain Injury, V6, P327, DOI 10.3109/02699059209034947
[6]   The use of proxies in community integration research [J].
Cusick, CP ;
Brooks, CA ;
Whiteneck, GG .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (08) :1018-1024
[7]   Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research [J].
Cusick, CP ;
Gerhart, KA ;
Mellick, DC .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2000, 15 (01) :739-749
[8]   Acute predictors of real-world outcomes following traumatic brain injury: a prospective study [J].
Dawson, DR ;
Levine, B ;
Schwartz, ML ;
Stuss, DT .
BRAIN INJURY, 2004, 18 (03) :221-238
[9]  
FABIANO RJ, 1992, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V37, P75, DOI 10.1037/0090-5550.37.2.75
[10]  
FEINSTEIN A.R., 1987, CLINIMETRICS