Lineage-dependent rates of evolutionary diversification: analysis of bivariate ellipses

被引:25
作者
Ricklefs, RE
Nealen, P
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Biol, St Louis, MO 63121 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Biol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
comparative methods; diversification; ellipse analysis; phylogenetic effect; trait evolution;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00263.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. A method based on the calculation of major and minor axes of bivariate ellipses to estimate relative rates of evolutionary diversification of two traits is presented. The advantage of ellipse analysis over the more common allometric or regression approaches to variation in comparative data is that diversification of each trait is estimated relative to that of the other. This can reveal differences in the relative rates of diversification of two traits among sister groups or, through hierarchical analysis, over the history of a lineage. 2. Equations are provided for calculating the size, shape and orientation of bivariate ellipses based on the variance-covariance matrix of the original data. Standard errors and biases of these parameters are also quantified. 3. Applications of ellipse analysis to the relationship between egg size and incubation period in birds illustrate differences in the diversification of two traits between independent lineages. Nested analysis of covariance based on taxonomic levels further illustrates how relative rates of evolutionary diversification may vary through the history of a monophyletic group. 4. A simple model incorporating both independent (special) and correlated (general) change in two traits shows how different shapes and orientations of bivariate ellipses can be produced by different rates of evolutionary diversification in special and general genetic factors. 5. Ellipse analysis is a descriptive tool that can clarify patterns of diversification. It cannot distinguish differences in evolutionary responsiveness (phylogenetic constraint) from differences in the selective environment affecting the shape and orientation of the bivariate ellipse. It can, however, provide a more detailed characterization of trait evolution than other comparative methods, taking advantage of the additional information provided by the shape and, in some cases, the dimensions of the bivariate ellipse.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 885
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A COMPARATIVE METHOD [J].
BELL, G .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1989, 133 (04) :553-571
[2]  
CHEVERUD JM, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P1335, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05699.x
[3]   Taxon-dependent diversification of life-history traits and the perception of phylogenetic constraints [J].
Derrickson, E. M. ;
Ricklefs, R. E. .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1988, 2 (03) :417-423
[4]   PATTERNS OF COVARIATION IN LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS OF SQUAMATE REPTILES - THE EFFECTS OF SIZE AND PHYLOGENY RECONSIDERED [J].
DUNHAM, AE ;
MILES, DB .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1985, 126 (02) :231-257
[5]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, AM NAT, V125, P1, DOI 10.1086/284325
[6]   WHY NOT TO DO 2-SPECIES COMPARATIVE-STUDIES - LIMITATIONS ON INFERRING ADAPTATION [J].
GARLAND, T ;
ADOLPH, SC .
PHYSIOLOGICAL ZOOLOGY, 1994, 67 (04) :797-828
[7]   PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA USING PHYLOGENETICALLY INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS [J].
GARLAND, T ;
HARVEY, PH ;
IVES, AR .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1992, 41 (01) :18-32
[8]   PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE BY COMPUTER-SIMULATION [J].
GARLAND, T ;
DICKERMAN, AW ;
JANIS, CM ;
JONES, JA .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1993, 42 (03) :265-292
[9]   ADAPTATION - STATISTICS AND A NULL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING PHYLOGENETIC EFFECTS [J].
GITTLEMAN, JL ;
KOT, M .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1990, 39 (03) :227-241
[10]   SPANDRELS OF SAN-MARCO AND THE PANGLOSSIAN PARADIGM - A CRITIQUE OF THE ADAPTATIONIST PROGRAM [J].
GOULD, SJ ;
LEWONTIN, RC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1979, 205 (1161) :581-598