Valuing scenic amenity using life satisfaction data

被引:69
作者
Ambrey, Christopher L. [2 ]
Fleming, Christopher M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Business Sch, Dept Accounting Finance & Econ, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Griffith Business Sch, Dept Accounting Finance & Econ, Griffith, Qld 4222, Australia
关键词
Geographic Information Systems (GIS); Happiness; Household; Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA); Life satisfaction; Non-market valuation; Scenic amenity; AIR-QUALITY; HAPPINESS SURVEYS; VALUATION; PREFERENCES; ENVIRONMENT; DETERMINANTS; VARIABLES; POLLUTION; CLIMATE; INCOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The life satisfaction approach has recently emerged as a new technique in the suite of options available to non-market valuation practitioners. Employing data from the Household. Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), this paper examines the influence of scenic amenity on the life satisfaction of residents of South East Queensland (SEQ), Australia. Measuring scenic amenity on a 10-point scale, it is found that, on average, a respondent is willing-to-pay approximately AUD $14,000 in household income per annum to obtain a one-unit improvement in scenic amenity. However, on closer inspection, we find that the relationship between willingness-to-pay and the level of scenic amenity is not linear. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to value scenic amenity using the life satisfaction approach and is the first paper to use this approach to value any type of environmental good or service in SEQ. As such, this paper represents a genuine contribution to a small, yet growing, body of literature. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 115
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Ambrey C., 2011, 5 AUSTR AGR RES EC S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, RM167 USDA FOR SERV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MEASUREMENT ENV RESO
[4]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2010, AUSTR STAND GEOGR CL
[5]   Pricing residential amenities: The value of a view [J].
Benson, ED ;
Hansen, JL ;
Schwartz, AL ;
Smersh, GT .
JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 1998, 16 (01) :55-73
[6]   Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments [J].
Bienabe, Estelle ;
Hearne, Robert R. .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 9 (04) :335-348
[7]   Determination of thresholds of visual impact: the case of wind turbines [J].
Bishop, ID .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2002, 29 (05) :707-718
[8]   Well-being over time in Britain and the USA [J].
Blanchflower, DG ;
Oswald, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (7-8) :1359-1386
[9]   Understanding fixed effects in human well-being [J].
Boyce, Christopher J. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 31 (01) :1-16
[10]   Happiness, geography and the environment [J].
Brereton, Finbarr ;
Clinch, J. Peter ;
Ferreira, Susana .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (02) :386-396