Revision of the EU Bathing Water Directive: economic costs and benefits

被引:17
作者
Georgiou, S [1 ]
Bateman, IJ
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Ctr Social & Econ Res Global Environm, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ E Anglia, Zuckerman Inst Connect Environm Res, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ Western Australia, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
economics; coastal waters; sewage; cost-benefit analysis; bathing; EU directive;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.11.036
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Union (EU) Bathing Water Directive of 1976 ([Commission of the European Communities, 1976. Council Directive of 8th December 1975 Concerning the Quality of Bathing Water (76/160/EEC). Official Journal of the European Community. 5th February 1976, L31/1, Brussels]) sets out standards for designated bathing waters which should be complied with by all member states. Intervening advances in pollution science, related technology and managerial expertise have allowed the European Commission to consider revision of EU environmental legislation where appropriate. As a result, a number of revisions to the 1976 Directive have been proposed ([Commission of the European Communities, 1994. Commission Proposal for a Council Directive Concerning the Quality of Bathing Water. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, COM (94) 36 Final, Brussels; Commission of the European Communities, 2000. Developing a New Bathing Water Policy, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, COM (2000) 860 Final, 21/12/200, Brussels; Commission of the European Communities, 2002. Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Quality of Bathing Water, COM (2002) 581 Final, 24/10/2002, Brussels]). This paper considers these revisions in terms of the economic costs and benefits associated with any change in policy. The focus is on the public's willingness to pay for a revised Directive and the consequent public health benefits afforded to individuals and society. These economic benefits are compared to the costs of implementing changes to bring bathing waters up to the required standard. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 438
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COMM REP, P36
[2]  
BARTON D, 1998, 2498 AGR U NORW DEP
[3]   Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: Expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Jones, AP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (02) :235-258
[4]  
Bennett J., 2001, CHOICE MODELLING APP
[5]   ESTIMATING THE VALUE OF WATER-QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS IN A RECREATIONAL DEMAND FRAMEWORK [J].
BOCKSTAEL, NE ;
HANEMANN, WM ;
KLING, CL .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1987, 23 (05) :951-960
[6]  
Bockstael NE., 1989, Marine Resource Economics, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.1086/MRE.6.1.42628999
[7]  
BROUWER R, 2004, COST BENEFIT ANAL WA
[8]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[9]  
CASCADE, 2002, REV BATHING WATER DI
[10]   The economic benefits of surface water quality improvements in developing countries: A case study of Davao, Philippines [J].
Choe, KA ;
Whittington, D ;
Lauria, DT .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (04) :519-537