STCA, TCAS, airproxes and collision risk

被引:15
作者
Brooker, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
关键词
collision avoidance; mid-air collision; ATM; ATC;
D O I
10.1017/S0373463305003334
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The focus here is on the performance of and interaction between the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) and the controller's short-term conflict alert (STCA) system. The data source used is UK Airprox Board Reports of close encounters between aircraft, and the focus is on commercial air transport aircraft using UK controlled airspace with a radar service. Do the systems work well together? Are controllers surprised when they find out that a pilot has received a TCAS resolution advisory? What do TCAS and STCA events say about collision risk? Generally, the systems seem to work together well. On most occasions, controllers are not surprised by TCAS advisories: either they have detected the problem themselves or STCA has alerted them to it. The statistically expected rate of future mid-air collisions is estimated by extrapolation of Airprox closest encounter distances.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 404
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
*BASI, 1991, LIM SEE AV PRINC
[2]   Improving short-term conflict alert via tabu search [J].
Beasley, JE ;
Howells, H ;
Sonander, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2002, 53 (06) :593-602
[3]  
Bennett S., 2004, Risk Management, V6, P31
[4]  
*BFU GERM FED BUR, 2004, AX0011202
[5]   The risk of mid-air collision to commercial air transport aircraft receiving a Radar Advisory Service in Class F/G airspace [J].
Brooker, P .
JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2003, 56 (02) :277-289
[6]  
BROOKER P, 2004, HUMAN FACTORS AEROSP, V4, P49
[7]  
BROOKS P, 2004, NAVIGATION NEWS MAR, P12
[8]  
*CAA, 2004, UK AIRP STAT 2003 AN
[9]  
*CAA, 2004, UK ATS AIRSP CLASS
[10]  
*CAA, 2003, ACAS ACT TAK FOLL RE