Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: Government policies and firm motivations

被引:363
作者
Demirel, Pelin [1 ]
Kesidou, Effie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
关键词
Cleaner production; Environmental regulation; Environmental taxes; Environmental Management Systems; Eco-R&D; ISO14001; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; INCENTIVES; PERSPECTIVE; CORPORATE; PERFORMANCE; INSTRUMENTS; TECHNOLOGY; STANDARDS; ISO-14001; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.019
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In this paper, we adopt a recent OECD framework and examine the role of external policy tools and internal firm specific factors for stimulating three different types of eco-innovations that range on a spectrum of lower to higher technological and environmental impacts: End-of-Pipeline Pollution Control Technologies, Integrated Cleaner Production Technologies and Environmental R&D. Using a novel firm-level dataset from a DEFRA survey, we estimate a Tobit model, which provides empirical evidence showing that these eco-innovations are motivated by different external policy tools and internal firm specific factors. Our findings indicate that End of Pipeline Technologies and Integrated Cleaner Production Technologies are mainly driven by equipment upgrade motives with a view of improving efficiency while environmental regulations are effective in stimulating the End-of-Pipeline technologies and Environmental R&D. Interestingly, alongside government induced regulations, we find that market factors, mainly motivated by cost savings, are effective in driving Environmental R&D. Finally, ISO14001 certification is effective in strengthening the positive impact of environmental management systems on both End-of-Pipeline technologies and Environmental R&D while CSR policies have no significant impact on motivating any of the eco-innovations. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1546 / 1557
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Environmental policies and innovation - A knowledge-based perspective on cooperative approaches [J].
Aggeri, F .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1999, 28 (07) :699-717
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, DIME WP 2 5 WORKSH E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ENV POLICY CORPORATE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, The Theory of environmental policy, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SUSTAINABLE MANUFACT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STERN REV EC CLIMATE
[7]   Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance [J].
Anton, WRQ ;
Deltas, G ;
Khanna, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :632-654
[8]   Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? A case for environmental management systems [J].
Arimura, Toshi H. ;
Hibiki, Akira ;
Katayama, Hajime .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (03) :281-295
[9]  
Ashford N.A., 1994, GOVT STRATEGIES POLI
[10]   Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001 [J].
Bansal, P ;
Hunter, T .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 46 (03) :289-299