Flexing analysis of ethane internal rotation energetics

被引:75
作者
Goodman, L [1 ]
Gu, HB [1 ]
Pophristic, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Wright & Rieman Chem Labs, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.478310
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A flexing analysis of the ethane barrier energy in terms of structural (Delta E-struct), steric exchange (Delta E-steric), and hyperconjugative charge-transfer (Delta E-deloc) energy contributions has been carried out using natural bond orbitals. No evidence is found for the view that the ethane staggered equilibrium geometry or the C-C bond expansion that accompanies rotation results from steric exchange repulsion interactions. The analysis shows that Delta E-struct and Delta E-deloc have very different stereoelectronic dependencies, but that the Delta E-steric and Delta E-deloc dependencies are antagonistic. All of their contributions are strongly affected by the C-C bond expansion, with the result that the barrier mechanism cannot be understood without taking into account their different relaxation dependencies. Neglect of C-C expansion leaves the charge-transfer interactions paramount by subduing the steric and structural contributions. These interactions are found to be an important determinant for the expansion. The strong expansion dependence found for Delta E-struct is largely controlled by weakening of the C-C bond, and to a lesser extent by concomitant strengthening of the C-H bonds. Most of this dependence can be mimicked by C-C expansion in the absence of methyl torsion indicating that C-C bond weakening does not arise from the symmetry change accompanying ethane torsion. (C) 1999 American Institute of Physics. [S0021-9606(99)31209-5].
引用
收藏
页码:4268 / 4275
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Natural bond orbital analysis of steric interactions [J].
Badenhoop, JK ;
Weinhold, F .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 107 (14) :5406-5421
[2]  
Badenhoop JK, 1999, INT J QUANTUM CHEM, V72, P269, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1999)72:4<269::AID-QUA9>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-8
[4]   ORIGIN OF ROTATION AND INVERSION BARRIERS [J].
BADER, RFW ;
CHEESEMAN, JR ;
LAIDIG, KE ;
WIBERG, KB ;
BRENEMAN, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 112 (18) :6530-6536
[5]   QUANTUM-MECHANICAL STUDIES ON THE ORIGIN OF BARRIERS TO INTERNAL-ROTATION ABOUT SINGLE BONDS [J].
BRUNCK, TK ;
WEINHOLD, F .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 101 (07) :1700-1709
[7]   LOCALIZED CHARGE DISTRIBUTIONS .1. GENERAL THEORY, ENERGY PARTITIONING, AND INTERNAL ROTATION BARRIER IN ETHANE [J].
ENGLAND, W ;
GORDON, MS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1971, 93 (19) :4649-&
[8]   NATURAL HYBRID ORBITALS [J].
FOSTER, JP ;
WEINHOLD, F .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1980, 102 (24) :7211-7218
[9]  
Frisch M.J., 1995, GAUSSIAN 94
[10]   SELF-CONSISTENT MOLECULAR-ORBITAL METHODS .25. SUPPLEMENTARY FUNCTIONS FOR GAUSSIAN-BASIS SETS [J].
FRISCH, MJ ;
POPLE, JA ;
BINKLEY, JS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 80 (07) :3265-3269