The influence of neighbor relatedness on multilevel selection in the Great Lakes sea rocket

被引:68
作者
Donohue, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
competition; dispersal; genetic relatedness; group selection; levels of selection; natural selection;
D O I
10.1086/375299
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Natural selection can operate at the individual and group level in natural populations. This study investigates the ecological factors that determine the relative importance of individual versus group selection. In particular, it determines how the relatedness of interacting neighbors influences multilevel natural selection in a population of the Great Lakes sea rocket. Focal plants were grown in groups of siblings, groups of plants that were themselves siblings but unrelated to the focal plants, and groups of plants with mixed genotypes. Significant group selection on plant size was observed only when the neighbors were siblings but not when they were unrelated. In sibling groups, individuals with heavier stems had higher fitness, and individuals growing with heavier but shorter neighbors also had higher fitness. Thus, individual and group selection on stem weight operated in the same direction. The detection of group selection in sibling groups can be attributed in part to an increased opportunity for group selection in these groups since sibling groups differed more from one another than the other group types. In addition, the quality of the selective environment in sibling groups may have differed from that for the other group types. Group selection was therefore more prevalent in the most genetically structured sample, in which responses to group selection are also most likely to occur.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 92
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   On indirect genetic effects in structured populations [J].
Agrawal, AF ;
Brodie, ED ;
Wade, MJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2001, 158 (03) :308-323
[2]   POPULATION STUDIES IN PREDOMINANTLY SELF-POLLINATING SPECIES .13. INTERGENOTYPIC COMPETITION AND POPULATION STRUCTURE IN BARLEY AND WHEAT [J].
ALLARD, RW ;
ADAMS, J .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1969, 103 (934) :621-+
[3]  
ANTONOVICS J, 1984, EVOLUTION, V38, P103, DOI [10.2307/2408550, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00263.x]
[4]   NEIGHBOR RELATEDNESS AND COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE IN IMPATIENS-CAPENSIS (BALSAMINACEAE) - A TEST OF THE RESOURCE PARTITIONING HYPOTHESIS [J].
ARGYRES, AZ ;
SCHMITT, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1992, 79 (02) :181-185
[5]   Complex colony structure in social insects .2. Reproduction, queen-worker conflict, and levels of selection [J].
Banschbach, VS ;
Herbers, JM .
EVOLUTION, 1996, 50 (01) :298-307
[6]   2 THEORIES OF SEX AND VARIATION [J].
BELL, G .
EXPERIENTIA, 1985, 41 (10) :1235-1245
[7]   SELECTION WITHIN AND BETWEEN KIN GROUPS OF THE IMPORTED WILLOW LEAF BEETLE [J].
BREDEN, F ;
WADE, MJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1989, 134 (01) :35-50
[8]   TESTS OF SIB DIVERSIFICATION THEORIES OF OUTCROSSING IN IMPATIENS-CAPENSIS - EFFECTS OF INBREEDING AND NEIGHBOR RELATEDNESS ON PRODUCTION AND INFESTATION [J].
BURT, A ;
BELL, G .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1992, 5 (04) :575-588
[9]   SIBLING COMPETITION IN PLANTS [J].
CHEPLICK, GP .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1992, 80 (03) :567-575
[10]   A QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODEL OF ALTRUISTIC SELECTION [J].
CHEVERUD, JM .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1985, 16 (03) :239-243