Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer after prior treatment with taxane plus platinum-based regimens

被引:36
作者
Kosmas, C
Tsavaris, N
Panopoulos, C
Vadiaka, M
Stavroyianni, N
Kourelis, T
Malamos, N
Antonopoulos, M
Kalofonos, HP
机构
[1] Helena Venizelou Hosp, Med Oncol Unit, Dept Med, GR-16341 Athens, Greece
[2] Univ Athens, Laikon Gen Hosp, Med Oncol Unit, Dept Med, Athens, Greece
[3] Agii Anargyri Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol 2, Athens, Greece
[4] Patras Univ Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Patras, Greece
关键词
non-small-cell lung cancer; chemotherapy; gemcitabine; vinorelbine; docetaxel; paclitaxel; ifosfamide; cisplatin;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00419-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Treatment options in patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of the poor activity of older agents after platinum-based therapy. The present phase II study aimed to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with relapsed NSCLC after pretreatment with taxane + platinum-based regimens, since gemcitabine has demonstrated activity in that setting and the combination has been well tolerated in previous phase I/II studies. Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages III/IV), World Health Organization (WHO), Performance Status (PS)less than or equal to2, prior platinum + taxane-based chemotherapy and unimpaired haematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered as follows: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2). both administered on days 1 and 8, recycled every 3 weeks. 40 patients were entered and 39 were evaluable for response and all 40 for toxicity: median age was 61 years (range 50-72 years), median PS = 1 (range 0 2), gender ratio = 37 males/3 females, stages at initial diagnoses were ILIA = 2, IIIB - 14, IV = 24. Metastatic sites included: lymph nodes: 23, bone: 4, liver: 5, brain: 4, lung nodules: 9, adrenals: 8, pleural effusion: 4. 22 patients had prior paclitaxel/ifosfamide/cisplatin treatment. Objective responses were; partial response (PR): 9/40 (22.5%), stable disease (SD): 13/40 (32.5%) and progressive disease (PD) 18/40 (45%). The median time-to-progression (TTP) was 4.5 months (range 1-17 months) and median survival 7 months (range 2-17 + months), 1-year survival was 17%. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 33% of patients. There was no grade 4 neutropenia and no episodes of febrile neutropenia, No grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3/4 other non-haematological toxicities were observed. The combination of gemcitabine/vinorelbine is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failing prior taxane/platinum therapy. This regimen represents a tolerable and effective combination to apply in the palliative treatment of relapsed NSCLC, (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:972 / 978
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ANDERSON H, 1997, LUNG CANCER, V8, P9
[2]   Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: Results of an eastern cooperative oncology group trial [J].
Bonomi, P ;
Kim, KM ;
Fairclough, D ;
Cella, D ;
Kugler, J ;
Rowinsky, E ;
Jiroutek, M ;
Johnson, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (03) :623-631
[3]   COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS SINGLE AGENTS FOLLOWED BY COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY IN STAGE-IV NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A STUDY OF THE EASTERN-COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP [J].
BONOMI, PD ;
FINKELSTEIN, DM ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC ;
BLUM, RH ;
GREEN, MD ;
MASON, B ;
HAHN, R ;
TORMEY, DC ;
HARRIS, J ;
COMIS, R ;
GLICK, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (11) :1602-1613
[4]   Gemcitabine as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:: A phase II trial [J].
Crinò, L ;
Mosconi, AM ;
Scagliotti, G ;
Selvaggi, G ;
Novello, S ;
Rinaldi, M ;
Della Giulia, M ;
Gridelli, C ;
Rossi, A ;
Calandri, C ;
De Marinis, F ;
Noseda, M ;
Tonato, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (07) :2081-2085
[5]   VINORELBINE VERSUS VINORELBINE PLUS CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
DEPIERRE, A ;
CHASTANG, C ;
QUOIX, E ;
LEBEAU, B ;
BLANCHON, F ;
PAILLOT, N ;
LEMARIE, E ;
MILLERON, B ;
MORO, D ;
CLAVIER, J ;
HERMAN, D ;
TUCHAIS, E ;
JACOULET, P ;
BRECHOT, JM ;
CORDIER, JF ;
SOLALCELIGNY, P ;
BADRI, N ;
BESENVAL, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (01) :37-42
[6]  
Feliu J, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V86, P1463, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991015)86:8<1463::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-N
[8]   Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens [J].
Fossella, FV ;
DeVore, R ;
Kerr, RN ;
Crawford, J ;
Natale, RR ;
Dunphy, F ;
Kalman, L ;
Miller, V ;
Lee, JS ;
Moore, M ;
Gandara, D ;
Karp, D ;
Vokes, E ;
Kris, M ;
Kim, Y ;
Gamza, F ;
Hammershaimb, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (12) :2354-2362
[9]   PHASE-II STUDY OF DOCETAXEL FOR ADVANCED OR METASTATIC PLATINUM-REFRACTORY NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
FOSSELLA, FV ;
LEE, JS ;
SHIN, DM ;
CALAYAG, M ;
HUBER, M ;
PEREZSOLER, R ;
MURPHY, WK ;
LIPPMAN, S ;
BENNER, S ;
GLISSON, B ;
CHASEN, M ;
HONG, WK ;
RABER, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (03) :645-651
[10]  
FRASCI G, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA485