Interobserver agreement for EUS in the evaluation and diagnosis of submucosal masses

被引:97
作者
Gress, F
Schmitt, C
Savides, T
Faigel, DO
Catalano, M
Wassef, W
Roubein, L
Nickl, N
Ciaccia, D
Bhutani, M
Hoffman, B
Affronti, J
机构
[1] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chattanooga, TN USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Portland VAMC, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Portland, OR USA
[6] St Lukes Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Racine, WI USA
[7] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[8] Univ Kentucky, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Lexington, KY USA
[9] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[10] Wright State Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[11] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[12] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Durham, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2001.111384
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
introduction: EUS is an accurate means of evaluating and diagnosing submucosal lesions of the GI tract. The aim of this study was to prospectively determine interobserver agreement for the EUS classification of submucosal masses among endosonographers with different levels of training and experience from multiple centers. Methods: Twenty patients with submucosal mass lesions diagnosed by upper endoscopy underwent EUS. Surgical findings were available for 16 patients. In 4 patients with obvious cystic/vascular structures (i.e., varices) no surgical specimen was necessary. A blinded observer developed a study videotape of critical endoscopic and EUS real-time imaging for each lesion. The videotape was distributed to 10 endosonographers, each with at least 1 year of experience, who independently reviewed the videotape and recorded their diagnosis based on EUS features. These endosonographers used previously agreed-upon standardized EUS diagnostic criteria for each category of lesion. A kappa (kappa) statistic, used to evaluate agreement, was calculated for each lesion category for the 10 endosonographers as a group and individually. An overall kappa statistic was also calculated. Significance was analyzed with a two-tailed t test. Results: Agreement was excellent for cystic lesions (kappa = 0.80) and extrinsic compressions (Ic = 0.94), good for lipoma (kappa = 0.65), fair for leiomyoma end vascular lesions (kappa = 0.53 and 0.54, respectively), and poor for other submucosal lesions (kappa = 0.34). Overall agreement among observers was good (kappa = 0.63). Furthermore, a significant association was noted between total years of EUS experience and the number of correct answers (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Interobserver agreement is good for characterizing submucosal masses by EUS. However, it appears to be better for some lesions than others. The overall length of experience with EUS appears to play an important role in the accuracy of this modality in the evaluation of submucosal lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 76
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF GASTRIC-CANCER - COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC US AND DYNAMIC CT
    BOTET, JF
    LIGHTDALE, CJ
    ZAUBER, AG
    GERDES, H
    WINAWER, SJ
    URMACHER, C
    BRENNAN, MF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (02) : 426 - 432
  • [2] PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER - COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC US AND DYNAMIC CT
    BOTET, JF
    LIGHTDALE, CJ
    ZAUBER, AG
    GERDES, H
    URMACHER, C
    BRENNAN, MF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (02) : 419 - 425
  • [3] EVALUATION OF SUBMUCOSAL UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT LESIONS BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
    BOYCE, GA
    SIVAK, MV
    ROSCH, T
    CLASSEN, M
    FLEISCHER, DE
    BOYCE, HW
    LIGHTDALE, CJ
    BOTET, JF
    HAWES, RH
    LEHMAN, GA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (04) : 449 - 454
  • [4] Interobserver agreement in endoscopic ultrasonography staging of esophageal and cardia cancer
    Burtin, P
    Napoleon, B
    Palazzo, L
    Roseau, G
    Souquet, JC
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [5] OBSERVER VARIATION AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    CATALANO, MF
    SIVAK, MV
    BEDFORD, RA
    FALK, GW
    VANSTOLK, R
    PRESA, F
    VANDAM, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (02) : 115 - 120
  • [6] Endosonographic differentiation of benign and malignant stromal cell tumors
    Chak, A
    Canto, MI
    Rosch, T
    Dittler, HJ
    Hawes, RH
    Tio, TL
    Lightdale, CJ
    Boyce, HW
    Scheiman, J
    Carpenter, SL
    VanDam, J
    Kochman, ML
    Sivak, MV
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (06) : 468 - 473
  • [7] Endosonographic T-staging of esophageal carcinoma: A learning curve
    Fockens, P
    VandenBrande, JHM
    vanDullemen, HM
    vanLanschot, JJB
    Tytgat, GNJ
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (01) : 58 - 62
  • [8] Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience
    Gress, FG
    Hawes, RH
    Savides, TJ
    Ikenberry, SO
    Cummings, O
    Kopecky, K
    Sherman, S
    Wiersema, M
    Lehman, GA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 50 (06) : 786 - 791
  • [9] ENDOLUMINAL ULTRASOUND FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING OF PANCREATIC-CANCER
    GRIMM, H
    MAYDEO, A
    SOEHENDRA, N
    [J]. BAILLIERES CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 4 (04): : 869 - 888
  • [10] Murata Y, 1988, Surg Endosc, V2, P180, DOI 10.1007/BF02498796