Postoperative titration of intravenous morphine

被引:58
作者
Aubrun, F [1 ]
Monsel, S [1 ]
Langeron, O [1 ]
Coriat, P [1 ]
Riou, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, CHU Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Paris, France
关键词
analgesics; opioid; morphine; pain; postoperative;
D O I
10.1046/j.0265-0215.2000.00796.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objective Intravenous morphine titration is used to obtain postoperative pain relief, but few studies have assessed the appropriate regimen. in a quality programme, we performed a prospective non-randomized study of morphine titration in a postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). Methods Four regimens of morphine titration were studied: every 10 (group 1, n=400) or 5 min (group 2, n=400) with a maximum of five intravenous boluses; every 5 min, without any limitation in the number of boluses (groups 3 and 4, n=400 each); in groups 1, 2, and 3, subcutaneous morphine was administered 4 h after titration. In group 4, administration of subcutaneous morphine was allowed only 2 h after titration. A visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) > 30 mm was required to administer morphine and pain relief was defined as a VAPS less than or equal to 30 mm. Results After morphine titration, VAPS was lower and the number of patients with pain relief was greater in patients from groups 3 and 4. Patients from group 4 had the lowest VAPS (26+/-17 mm) and the highest percentage of pain relief (73%) at the end of the PACU period. The number of sedated patients increased in groups 3 (62%) and 4 (61%) compared with group 1 (27%). No significant differences in morphine-related adverse effects were observed. Conclusion Intravenous morphine titration every 5 min with an unlimited number of boluses and early subcutaneous administration provided the best analgesic regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 165
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
  • [2] CAN IMMEDIATE OPIOID REQUIREMENTS IN THE POSTANESTHESIA CARE UNIT BE USED TO DETERMINE ANALGESIC REQUIREMENTS ON THE WARD
    BUTSCHER, K
    MAZOIT, JX
    SAMII, K
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (06): : 461 - 466
  • [3] IMPROVED APPROXIMATE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAMPLE SIZES FOR COMPARING 2 BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTIONS
    CASAGRANDE, JT
    PIKE, MC
    SMITH, PG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1978, 34 (03) : 483 - 486
  • [4] THE MORPHINE-SPARING EFFECT OF PROPACETAMOL IN ORTHOPEDIC POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
    DELBOS, A
    BOCCARD, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1995, 10 (04) : 279 - 286
  • [5] DODSON ME, 1989, GENERAL ANAESTHESIA, P1123
  • [6] EDWARDS WT, 1990, ANESTHESIOL CLIN N A, V8, P235
  • [7] FEELEY TW, 1990, ANESTHESIA, P2113
  • [8] PHARMACOKINETICS OF MORPHINE - EFFECTS OF HYPERCARBIA ON SERUM AND BRAIN MORPHINE CONCENTRATIONS IN DOG
    FINCK, AD
    BERKOWITZ, BA
    HEMPSTEAD, J
    NGAI, SH
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1977, 47 (05) : 407 - 410
  • [9] PHARMACOKINETICS OF MORPHINE INJECTED INTRAVENOUSLY INTO THE ANESTHETIZED DOG
    HUG, CC
    MURPHY, MR
    RIGEL, EP
    OLSON, WA
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1981, 54 (01) : 38 - 47
  • [10] MACINTYRE PE, 1995, PAIN, V64, P357