Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology - A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:297
作者
Arbyn, Marc [1 ]
Bergeron, Christine
Klinkhamer, Paul
Martin-Hirsch, Pierre
Siebers, Albertus G.
Bulten, Johan
机构
[1] Sci Inst Publ Hlth, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000296488.85807.b3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare test performance characteristics of conventional Pap tests and liquid-based cervical cytology samples. DATA SOURCES: Eligible studies, published between 1991 and 2007 were retrieved through PubMed/EmBase searching and completed by consultation of other sources. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected if a conventional and a liquid-based sample were prepared from the same woman or when one or the other type of sample was taken from a separate but similar cohort. The current systematic review and meta-analysis is restricted to studies where all subjects were submitted to gold standard verification, based on colposcopy and histology of colposcopy-targeted biopsies, allowing computation of absolute and relative test validity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. Randomized trials were selected as well if all test-positive cases were verified with the same gold standard, allowing computation of the relative sensitivity. Impact of study characteristics on accuracy was assessed by subgroup meta-analyses, meta-regression, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve regression. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The relative sensitivity, pooled from eight studies, with complete gold standard verification and from one randomized clinical trial, did not differ significantly from unity. Also, the specificity, considering high-grade and lowgrade squamous intraepithelial lesions as cutoff, was similar in conventional and liquid cytology. However, a lower pooled specificity was found for liquid-based cytology when presence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance was the cutoff (ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.84-0.98). Differences in study characteristics did not explain interstudy heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Liquid-based cervical cytology is neither more sensitive nor more specific for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the conventional Pap test.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey
    Abulafia, O
    Pezzullo, JC
    Sherer, DM
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (01) : 137 - 144
  • [2] *ANAES, 2002, GUID FOLL PAT HAV AB
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Cervix Cancer Screening
  • [4] [Anonymous], STATA TECH B
  • [5] [Anonymous], LIQ BAS CYT CERV SCR
  • [6] Clinical utility of HPV-DNA detection: Triage of minor cervical lesions, follow-up of women treated for high-grade CIN: An update of pooled evidence
    Arbyn, M
    Paraskevaidis, E
    Martin-Hirsch, P
    Prendiville, W
    Dillner, J
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 99 (03) : S7 - S11
  • [7] Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal pap smears: A meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
    Arbyn, M
    Buntinx, F
    Van Ranst, M
    Paraskevaidis, E
    Martin-Hirsch, P
    Dillner, J
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (04): : 280 - 293
  • [8] ARBYN M, 2003, 10 SCI I PUBL HLTH
  • [9] Clinical applications of HPV testing: A summary of meta-analyses
    Arbyn, Marc
    Sasieni, Peter
    Meijer, Chris J. L. M.
    Clavel, Christine
    Koliopoulos, George
    Dillner, Joakim
    [J]. VACCINE, 2006, 24 : 78 - 89
  • [10] Austin RM, 1998, ACTA CYTOL, V42, P178