Putting Standards Into Practice: Evaluating the Utility of the NAGC Pre-K-Grade 12 Gifted Program Standards

被引:14
作者
Matthews, Michael S. [1 ]
Shaunessy, Elizabeth [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Special Educ & Child Dev, Acadmically Intellectually Gifted Program, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Special Educ, Gifted Educ Program, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
NAGC Pre-K-Grade 12 Gifted Program Standards; identification; evaluation; special populations/underserved gifted; professional development; PERSONNEL PREPARATION; STATE; EDUCATION; ADVOCACY; BLACK; FIELD;
D O I
10.1177/0016986209356708
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Despite their importance, there has been surprisingly little scholarly examination of the NAGC Pre-K-Grade 12 Gifted Program Standards (NAGC, 2008/2000; Landrum, Callahan, & Shaklee, 2001) since their publication a decade ago. As part of a larger study investigating the effectiveness of local policies developed within the framework of state law, we used a qualitative approach to examine the 'minimum' and 'exemplary' criteria from the Student Identification portion of these NAGC Standards. Through this process we developed a 27-item checklist, which we then used to evaluate 43 locally developed plans for identifying diverse gifted learners from one large state in the southeastern United States. Based on this experience, we identify the strengths and weaknesses that we encountered in using the Standards for this purpose. We provide the checklist items we developed, and we offer specific suggestions for how the Gifted Program Standards in their currently ongoing revision process might be made more user-friendly for practitioners to apply toward effective evaluation of gifted program documents.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 167
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anfara V.A., 2002, EDUC RESEARCHER, V31, P28, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X031007028
[2]   State policies and equal opportunity: The example of gifted education [J].
Baker, BA ;
Friedman-Nimz, R .
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2004, 26 (01) :39-64
[3]   A national view of promising programs and practices for culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse gifted and talented students [J].
Briggs, Christine J. ;
Reis, Sally M. ;
Sullivan, Erin E. .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2008, 52 (02) :131-145
[4]   A Five-State Analysis of Gifted Education Policies [J].
Brown, Elissa ;
Avery, Linda ;
Van Tassel-Baska, Joyce ;
Worley, Bess, II ;
Stambaugh, Tamra .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2006, 29 (01) :11-23
[5]  
Callahan C., 1994, Identifying outstanding talent in American Indian and Alaska Native students
[6]   Identifying gifted students from underrepresented populations [J].
Callahan, CM .
THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2005, 44 (02) :98-104
[7]   A report card on the state of research on the talented and gifted [J].
Coleman, Laurence J. .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2006, 50 (04) :346-350
[8]   Five ingredients for success: Two case studies of advocacy at the state level [J].
Delcourt, MAB .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2003, 47 (01) :26-37
[9]  
*FL DEP ED, 1998, 19996 FLOR DEP ED
[10]   The hidden history of IQ and special education - Can the problems be solved? [J].
Flynn, JR .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2000, 6 (01) :191-198