Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language

被引:239
作者
Lieberman, Erez [1 ]
Michel, Jean-Baptiste
Jackson, Joe
Tang, Tina
Nowak, Martin A.
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Program Evolutionary Dynam, Dept Math, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Appl Math, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] MIT, Harvard Mit Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Syst Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature06137
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Human language is based on grammatical rules(1-4). Cultural evolution allows these rules to change over time(5). Rules compete with each other: as new rules rise to prominence, old ones die away. To quantify the dynamics of language evolution, we studied the regularization of English verbs over the past 1,200 years. Although an elaborate system of productive conjugations existed in English's proto-Germanic ancestor, Modern English uses the dental suffix, '-ed', to signify past tense(6). Here we describe the emergence of this linguistic rule amidst the evolutionary decay of its exceptions, known to us as irregular verbs. We have generated a data set of verbs whose conjugations have been evolving for more than a millennium, tracking inflectional changes to 177 Old-English irregular verbs. Of these irregular verbs, 145 remained irregular in Middle English and 98 are still irregular today. We study how the rate of regularization depends on the frequency of word usage. The half-life of an irregular verb scales as the square root of its usage frequency: a verb that is 100 times less frequent regularizes 10 times as fast. Our study provides a quantitative analysis of the regularization process by which ancestral forms gradually yield to an emerging linguistic rule.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 716
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Linguistics - Modelling the dynamics of language death [J].
Abrams, DM ;
Strogatz, SH .
NATURE, 2003, 424 (6951) :900-900
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1966, CURRENT TRENDS LINGU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1949, Human behaviour and the principle of least-effort
[4]   From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition [J].
Bybee, Joan .
LANGUAGE, 2006, 82 (04) :711-733
[5]  
Bybee Joan L., 1985, MORPHOLOGY STUDY REL, DOI DOI 10.1075/TSL.9
[6]  
Chomsky N., 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax
[7]  
Chomsky Noam., 1993, Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, P506
[8]  
CLARK R, 1993, LINGUIST INQ, V24, P299
[9]  
Corbett G., 2001, FREQUENCY EMERGENCE, P201, DOI [DOI 10.1075/TSL.45.11COR, DOI 10.1075/TSL.45.11C0R]
[10]  
DOUGHERTY RC, 1994, NATURAL LANGUAGE CO