Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment

被引:79
作者
Ruijer, Erna [1 ]
Meijer, Albert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Sch Governance, Bijlhouwerstr 6, NL-3511 ZC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Sch Governance, Publ Innovat, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
innovation; open government data; strategic niche management; transparency; STRATEGIC NICHE MANAGEMENT; ADOPTION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Open government data are claimed to contribute to transparency, citizen participation, collaboration, economic and public service development. From an innovation perspective, we explore the current gap between the promise and practice of open government data. Based on Strategic Niche Management (SNM), we identify different phases in the open data innovation process. This study uses a living lab in a province in the Netherlands to stimulate the provision and use of open data for collaborative processes and analyses the mechanisms that condition the success of this innovation process. The results based on six interventions over a period of two years show that our interventions stimulated the use of open data and raised awareness within government, but that various mechanisms inhibited the realization of the ambitions of open government data. We conclude that the challenge of open government data as an innovation lies in finding a way to scale up the provision of open data: innovation niches are established but "regime changes" do not take place. Scaling up open government data use requires strong managerial commitment and changes in the wider organizational landscape such as constructing formal and informal rules and technological developments that stimulate debate about open data practices.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 635
页数:23
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Exploring dynamics and strategies of niche protection
    Boon, Wouter P. C.
    Moors, Ellen H. M.
    Meijer, Albert J.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (04) : 792 - 803
  • [2] Borins SandfordF., 2014, The Persistence of Innovation in Government
  • [3] Experimental public administration from 1992 to 2014 A systematic literature review and ways forward
    Bouwman, Robin
    Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2016, 29 (02) : 110 - 131
  • [4] Bryman A., 2012, Social research methods, V4th Rev.
  • [5] Caniels M., 2006, STRATEGIC NICHE MANA
  • [6] Ceschin F, 2014, INT J DES, V8, P1
  • [7] On the barriers for local government releasing open data
    Conradie, Peter
    Choenni, Sunil
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2014, 31 : S10 - S17
  • [8] Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach
    Dawes, Sharon S.
    Vidiasova, Lyudmila
    Parkhimovich, Olga
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (01) : 15 - 27
  • [9] Dawes SS, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6228, P50, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_5
  • [10] Dekker R., 2017, ANN NIG C MAASTR