Mapping stewardship networks in urban ecosystems

被引:30
作者
Belaire, J. Amy [1 ]
Dribin, Andrew K. [2 ]
Johnston, Douglas P. [1 ]
Lynch, Douglas J. [1 ]
Minor, Emily S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Biol Sci MC 066, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Art Hist MC 201, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2011年 / 4卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Calumet; collaborative natural resource management; conservation; social network analysis; stewardship; urban ecology; stakeholder participation; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00200.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Collaboration is often promoted as an effective strategy for conservation and natural resource management. Collaboration and communication can be particularly importantbut challengingin cities where there are many diverse stakeholders. However, there is little information about the factors that increase social interactions in urban stewardship networks. We used social network analysis to examine the extent of collaboration and patterns in the flow of information, ideas, and funding among stakeholders in an industrial urban ecosystem. Organizations associated with a regional conservation alliance (Chicago Wilderness) had more connections than other organizations. Geographic proximity, of both office locations and shared field sites, also increased interactions. All interaction types were correlated with each other, suggesting that one form of interaction may lead to additional connections. Despite spanning a large geographic area and incorporating many diverse organizations, the network we evaluated appeared to be remarkably well connected and shows great promise for successful conservation outcomes. Our approach can be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in other collaborative stewardship efforts and uncover key actions that may improve conservation in urban areas.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 473
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Alberti Marina., 2008, ADV URBAN ECOLOGY IN, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75510-6
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1899, Botanical Gazette, DOI DOI 10.1086/327796
[3]   Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity [J].
Armitage, Derek R. ;
Plummer, Ryan ;
Berkes, Fikret ;
Arthur, Robert I. ;
Charles, Anthony T. ;
Davidson-Hunt, Iain J. ;
Diduck, Alan P. ;
Doubleday, Nancy C. ;
Johnson, Derek S. ;
Marschke, Melissa ;
McConney, Patrick ;
Pinkerton, Evelyn W. ;
Wollenberg, Eva K. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (02) :95-102
[4]  
Batagelj V, 2004, MATH VIS, P77
[5]  
BERG AM, 2002, CALUMET AREA LAND US
[6]   The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? [J].
Bodin, Orjan ;
Crona, Beatrice I. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2009, 19 (03) :366-374
[7]  
Borgatti S. P., 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis (Version 6), DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2009.01613.X, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01613.x]
[8]   The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology [J].
Borgatti, SP ;
Foster, PC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (06) :991-1013
[9]   Tragedy averted: The promise of collaboration [J].
Bryan, TA .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2004, 17 (10) :881-896
[10]   Co-management: concepts and methodological implications [J].
Carlsson, L ;
Berkes, F .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 75 (01) :65-76