A comparison of the ability of black box and neural network models of ARX structure to represent a fluidized bed anaerobic digestion process

被引:16
作者
Premier, GC [1 ]
Dinsdale, R
Guwy, AJ
Hawkes, FR
Hawkes, DL
Wilcox, SJ
机构
[1] Univ Glamorgan, Sch Design & Adv Technol, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, M Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Glamorgan, Sch Appl Sci, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, M Glam, Wales
关键词
anaerobic; digestion; modeling; ARX; black box; neural network; fluidized bed;
D O I
10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00287-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The performance of three black box models which were parameterized and validated using data collected from a laboratory scale fluidized bed anaerobic digester, were compared. The models investigated were all ARX (auto regressive with exogenous input) models, the first being a linear single input single output (SISO) model, the second a linear multi-input multi-output (MIMO) model and the third a nonlinear neural network based model. The performance of the models were compared using correlation analysis of the residuals (one-step-ahead prediction errors) and it was found that the SISO model was the least able to predict the changes in the reactor parameters (bicarbonate alkalinity, gas production rate and % carbon dioxide). The MIMO and neural models both performed reasonably well. Though the neural model was shown to be superior overall to the MIMO model, the simplicity of the latter should be a consideration in choosing between them. A simulation with an horizon approaching 48 h was performed using this model and showed that although the absolute values differed significantly, there were encouraging similarities between the dynamic behavior of the model and that of the fluidized bed reactor. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1037
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Bishop C. M., 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
[2]   COMPARISON OF LINEAR, NONLINEAR AND NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED ADAPTIVE CONTROLLERS FOR A CLASS OF FED-BATCH FERMENTATION PROCESSES [J].
BOSKOVIC, JD ;
NARENDRA, KS .
AUTOMATICA, 1995, 31 (06) :817-840
[3]   NONLINEAR-SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION USING NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
CHEN, S ;
BILLINGS, SA ;
GRANT, PM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1990, 51 (06) :1191-1214
[4]   DYNAMIC MODELING OF A SINGLE-STAGE HIGH-RATE ANAEROBIC REACTOR .1. MODEL DERIVATION [J].
COSTELLO, DJ ;
GREENFIELD, PF ;
LEE, PL .
WATER RESEARCH, 1991, 25 (07) :847-858
[5]   Hydrogen production in a high rate fluidised bed anaerobic digester [J].
Guwy, AJ ;
Hawkes, FR ;
Hawkes, DL ;
Rozzi, AG .
WATER RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (06) :1291-1298
[6]   CHARACTERIZATION OF A PROTOTYPE INDUSTRIAL ONLINE ANALYZER FOR BICARBONATE CARBONATE MONITORING [J].
GUWY, AJ ;
HAWKES, DL ;
HAWKES, FR ;
ROZZI, AG .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1994, 44 (11) :1325-1330
[7]  
HE X, 1993, P AM CONTR C SAN FRA
[8]   REDUCED-ORDER MODELS FOR ONLINE PARAMETER-IDENTIFICATION OF THE ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESS [J].
JEPPSSON, U ;
OLSSON, G .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 28 (11-12) :173-183
[9]   ANAEROBIC DIGESTION .2. CHARACTERIZATION AND CONTROL OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION [J].
KOTZE, JP ;
THIEL, PG ;
HATTINGH, WH .
WATER RESEARCH, 1969, 3 (07) :459-&
[10]  
Ljung L, 1987, SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIO