The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship

被引:344
作者
De Massis, Alfredo [1 ]
Kotlar, Josip [1 ]
机构
[1] Lancaster Univ Management Sch, IEED, Ctr Family Business, Lancaster, England
关键词
Case studies; Case study research; Qualitative methods; Family business; Validity; Reliability; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, we provide guidelines that are useful to family business researchers when deciding whether and how to use case studies as well as to reviewers and editors when evaluating case study work. Drawing on examples from our published qualitative research and the complementary insights from other case study work in the field, we offer general suggestions for choosing the case study design, defining the unit of analysis, selecting cases (sampling), collecting information, analysing information, presenting results and ensuring validity and reliability in research findings. By outlining the most important and distinctive challenges faced by qualitative researchers of family business and establishing the relevance and usefulness of the case study method for generating new and valuable insights into family businesses, this article attempts to move the family business field beyond its current state, encourages scholars to engage in the case study method in high-quality family business research, and suggests important implications for scholars, reviewers and editors of case studies in the family business field. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 29
页数:15
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [1] Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration
    Amabile, TM
    Patterson, C
    Mueller, J
    Wojcik, T
    Odomirok, PW
    Marsh, M
    Kramer, SJ
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (02) : 418 - 431
  • [2] The philosophy and politics of quality in qualitative organizational research
    Amis, John M.
    Silk, Michael L.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 11 (03) : 456 - 480
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, DOI DOI 10.1002/NUR.4770140111
  • [4] [Anonymous], SAGE DICT QUALITATIV
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1996, Qualitative Research Design: an Interactive Approach
  • [6] [Anonymous], J SMALL BUS IN PRESS
  • [7] Astrachan J.H., 1988, Family Business Review, V1, P165, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1988.00165.X
  • [8] PUBLISHING IN AMJ-PART 7: WHAT'S DIFFERENT ABOUT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH?
    Bansal, Pratima
    Corley, Kevin
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (03) : 509 - 513
  • [9] Barry CA, 1998, SOCIOL RES ONLINE, V3
  • [10] Bartunek JM, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P9