Taxanes as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and practice guideline

被引:108
作者
Chu, Q
Vincent, M
Logan, D
Mackay, JA
Evans, WK
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Canc Care Ontario Program Evidence Based Care, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[2] Cross Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] London Reg Canc Ctr, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada
[4] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Juravinski Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
关键词
non-small cell lung cancer; chemotherapy; docetaxel; paclitaxel; practice guideline; treatment guideline;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.06.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
This evidence-based practice guideline on the use of pactitaxel (Taxol (R)) or docetaxel (Taxotere (R)) as first-tine treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who are candidates for palliative first-line chemotherapy is based on a systematic search and review of literature published in full or in abstract form between 1985 and April 2005. Forty-five randomized trials, including 11 abstracts, were reviewed and clinicians in the province of Ontario, Canada, provided feedback on a draft version of the guideline. Two phase III trials detected a statistically significant survival advantage for a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with best supportive care versus best supportive care alone. Among the nine fully published phase III trials comparing platinum-based chemotherapies, taxane-platinum combinations achieved higher response rates compared with older chemotherapy combinations, although significantly longer survival was observed only for docetaxel-cisplatin compared with vindesine-cisplatin. Response rates and survival were generally not significantly different for taxane-platinum combinations compared with other current chemotherapy combinations, although the toxicity profile of the regimens varied. However, in one large trial, improved tumor response and modest survival and quality of life benefits were associated with docetaxel-cisplatin compared with vinorelbine-cisplatin. No statistically significant survival differences were detected in the three fully published phase III trials comparing a taxane-gemcitabine combination with a taxane-platinum regimen. Recommendations: (i) pactitaxel or docetaxel combined with cisplatin is recommended as one of a number of chemotherapy options for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients with a good performance status; (ii) carboplatin may be combined with a taxane if a patient is unable or unwitting to take cisplatin; (iii) a taxane-gemcitabine combination may be considered for patients with a contraindication to cisplatin and carboplatin; (iv) no firm recommendation can be made on the optimal dose and schedule of taxane-based chemotherapy; however, commonly used regimens include cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) combined with either docetaxet 75 mg/m(2) or pactitaxel 135 mg/m(2) (24-h infusion) and carboplatin AUC 6 combined with pactitaxet 225mg/m(2) (3-h infusion); (v) a single-agent taxane may be used if combination chemotherapy is considered inappropriate. (c) 2005 Cancer Care Ontario. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. ALL rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 374
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]
BANERJEE S, 2002, TREATMENT INOPERABLE
[2]
Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation [J].
Belani, CP ;
Barstis, J ;
Perry, MC ;
La Rocca, RV ;
Nattam, SR ;
Rinaldi, D ;
Clark, R ;
Mills, GM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (15) :2933-2939
[3]
BELANI CP, 1998, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V17, P455
[4]
Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: Results of an eastern cooperative oncology group trial [J].
Bonomi, P ;
Kim, KM ;
Fairclough, D ;
Cella, D ;
Kugler, J ;
Rowinsky, E ;
Jiroutek, M ;
Johnson, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (03) :623-631
[5]
THE PRACTICE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CYCLE - A CONCEPTUAL TOOL FOR PRACTICE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION [J].
BROWMAN, GP ;
LEVINE, MN ;
MOHIDE, EA ;
HAYWARD, RSA ;
PRITCHARD, KI ;
GAFNI, A ;
LAUPACIS, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (02) :502-512
[6]
PHASE-II STUDY OF TAXOL, MERBARONE, AND PIROXANTRONE IN STAGE-IV NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - THE EASTERN COOPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUP RESULTS [J].
CHANG, AY ;
KIM, K ;
GLICK, J ;
ANDERSON, T ;
KARP, D ;
JOHNSON, D .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :388-394
[7]
Paclitaxel plus carboplatin, compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, shows similar efficacy while more cost-effective: a randomized phase II study of combination chemotherapy against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated [J].
Chen, YM ;
Perng, RP ;
Lee, YC ;
Shih, JF ;
Lee, CS ;
Tsai, CM ;
Whang-Peng, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (01) :108-115
[8]
A randomised phase II study of weekly paclitaxel or vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated [J].
Chen, YM ;
Perng, RP ;
Shih, JF ;
Lee, YC ;
Lee, CS ;
Tsai, CM ;
Whang-Peng, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (02) :359-365
[9]
Taxol and cisplatin (TP) versus etoposide cisplatin (EP) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [J].
Ciuleanu, TE ;
Cebotaru, C ;
Radulescu, I ;
Todor, N ;
Ghilezan, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 :S251-S252
[10]
Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review [J].
Clegg, A ;
Scott, DA ;
Hewitson, P ;
Sidhu, M ;
Waugh, N .
THORAX, 2002, 57 (01) :20-28