Evaluation of North American antibody detection tests for diagnosis of brucellosis in goats

被引:25
作者
Mikolon, AB
Gardner, IA
Hietala, SK
De Anda, JH
Pestaña, EC
Hennager, SG
Edmondson, AJ
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Med & Epidemiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Calif Dept Food & Agr, Anim Hlth Branch, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
[3] USDA, Natl Vet Serv Labs, Diagnost Bacteriol Lab, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[4] Univ Autonoma Baja California, Inst Invest & Ciencias Vet, Mexicali 21100, Baja California, Mexico
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.36.6.1716-1722.1998
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The sensitivities and specificities of 17 antibody detection tests for brucellosis in goats were estimated. Tests evaluated included the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) card test with 8% cell concentration (8%Card), USDA rapid automated presumptive test (RAP), Mexican rose bengal plate tests with 8 and 3% cell concentrations (8%RB and 3%RB), French rose bengal plate test with 4.5% cell concentration (4.5%RB), USDA standard plate test (SPT), USDA buffered acidified plate agglutination test (BAPA), USDA and Mexican rivanol tests (URIV and MRIV), USDA standard tube tests with Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis antigens (SATA and SATM), serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), USDA cold-fixation complement fixation tests with B. abortus and B. melitensis antigens (CFA and CRM), USDA and Mexican milk ring tests (UBRT and MBRT), and a milk ELISA. Test sensitivity was evaluated by using two groups of 10 goats experimentally infected with B. melitensis or B. abortus and monitored for 24 weeks. Specificity was evaluated by using 200 brucellosis-free nonvaccinated goats from 10 California herds. The 3%RB was considered a good screening test because of high sensitivity at week 24 postinfection (90%), ease of performance, and low cost. The cold-fixation CFA and CFM had 100% specificity in the field study and were considered appropriate confirmatory tests. The milk ELISA was significantly more sensitive (P < 0.05) than the UBRT and significantly more specific (P < 0.05) than the MBRT. The milk ELISA also had the advantage of objectivity and ease of interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:1716 / 1722
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] ACHA PN, 1987, ZOONOSES COMMUNICABL, P24
  • [2] Alton G. G., 1990, Animal brucellosis., P383
  • [3] ALTON GG, 1972, AM J VET RES, V33, P1747
  • [4] ALTON GG, 1970, RES VET SCI, V2, P54
  • [5] [Anonymous], ANIMAL BRUCELLOSIS
  • [6] EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT ROSE-BENGAL AND COMPLEMENT-FIXATION ANTIGENS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS INFECTION IN SHEEP AND GOATS
    BLASCO, JM
    GARINBASTUJI, B
    MARIN, CM
    GERBIER, G
    FANLO, J
    DEBAGUES, MPJ
    CAU, C
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1994, 134 (16) : 415 - 420
  • [7] EVALUATION OF ALLERGIC AND SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSING BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS INFECTION IN SHEEP
    BLASCO, JM
    MARIN, C
    DEBAGUES, MJ
    BARBERAN, M
    HERNANDEZ, A
    MOLINA, L
    VELASCO, J
    DIAZ, R
    MORIYON, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (08) : 1835 - 1840
  • [8] *CAMP NAC BRUC AN, 1995, NORMA OF MEX EM NOM, P23
  • [9] ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR THE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC AND LABORATORY TESTS
    CAMPBELL, G
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (5-7) : 499 - 508
  • [10] CHIA JKS, 1990, REV INFECT DIS, V12, P636