Comparison of summer and winter California central valley aerosol distributions from lidar and MODIS measurements

被引:12
作者
Lewis, Jasper [1 ]
De Young, Russell [2 ]
Ferrare, Richard [2 ]
Chu, D. Allen [3 ]
机构
[1] Hampton Univ, Ctr Atmospher Sci, Hampton, VA 23668 USA
[2] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Sci Directorate, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[3] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Goddard Earth Sci & Technol Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
MODIS; Aerosol; California; San Joaquin Valley; Lidar; SPECTRAL-RESOLUTION LIDAR; OPTICAL DEPTH; AIR-QUALITY; VALIDATION; SPACE; PM2.5; DELHI;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.07.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aerosol distributions from two aircraft lidar campaigns conducted in the California Central Valley are compared in order to identify seasonal variations. Aircraft lidar flights were conducted in June 2003 and February 2007. While the ground PM2.5 (particulate matter with diameter <= 2.5 mu m) concentration was highest in the winter, the aerosol optical depth (ADD) measured from the MODIS and lidar instruments was highest in the summer. A multiyear seasonal comparison shows that PM2.5 in the winter can exceed summer PM2.5 by 68%, while summer AOD from MODIS exceeds winter AOD by 29%. Warmer temperatures and wildfires in the summer produce elevated aerosol layers that are detected by satellite measurements, but not necessarily by surface particulate matter monitors. Temperature inversions, especially during the winter, contribute to higher PM2.5 measurements at the surface. Measurements of the mixing layer height from lidar instruments provide valuable information needed to understand the correlation between satellite measurements of AOD and in situ measurements of PM2.5. Lidar measurements also reflect the ammonium nitrate chemistry observed in the San Joaquin Valley, which may explain the discrepancy between the MODIS AOD and PM2.5 measurements. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4510 / 4520
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Ackermann J, 1998, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V15, P1043, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<1043:TETBRO>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Improving national air quality forecasts with satellite aerosol observations [J].
Al-Saadi, J ;
Szykman, J ;
Pierce, RB ;
Kittaka, C ;
Neil, D ;
Chu, DA ;
Remer, L ;
Gumley, L ;
Prins, E ;
Weinstock, L ;
MacDonald, C ;
Wayland, R ;
Dimmick, F ;
Fishman, J .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 86 (09) :1249-+
[4]  
ALSAADI JA, 2008, 10 C ATM CHEM AM MET
[5]   On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's central valley [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Mitchell, JP ;
Mancinelli, R ;
Karlen, DL ;
Hartz, TK ;
Horwath, WR ;
Pettygrove, GS ;
Scow, KM ;
Munk, DS .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (01) :12-23
[6]  
BOERS R, 1984, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V23, P247, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0247:LOOMLD>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
*CAL FIRE, 2007, WILDF ACT STAT
[9]  
Chow J. C., 1997, TECHNICAL SUPPORT ST
[10]   Temporal variations of PM2.5, PM10, and gaseous precursors during the 1995 integrated monitoring study in central California [J].
Chow, JC ;
Watson, JG ;
Lowenthal, DH ;
Hackney, R ;
Magliano, K ;
Lehrman, D ;
Smith, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1999, 49 :16-24